My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 1
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
030408
>
16 ATTACHMENT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2008 3:59:56 PM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENT 1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Francisco Bay Area Draft Regional Housing Needs .-111ocation, 4'~' Revision <br />• Household growth (45%) <br />• Existing employment (22.5%) <br />• Employment growth (22.5%) <br />• Household growth near existing transit (5%) <br />• Employment growth near existing transit (5%) <br />Household growth, existing employment, and employment growth are estimated in ABAG's <br />regional household and employment forecasts, Projections. <br />A. Household Growth, 45 percent <br />Each local jurisdiction should plan for housing according to regionally projected household <br />growth within its boundaries during the RHNA planning period (2007 - 2014). Household <br />growth should be weighted 45 percent in the allocation. <br />The use of housing as a RHNA factor represents consistency with local, regional, and state <br />policies regarding where housing growth will and should occur in the region. Where and how <br />much housing growth will occur in the region is estimated by ABAG's forecasting model, as <br />documented in Projections. Specifically, household growth is based on: 1) local land use <br />policies and plans; 2) demographic and economic trends, such as migration, birth and death <br />rates, housing prices, and travel costs; and 3) regional growth policies. <br />Household growth in ABAG's Projections is most influenced by local land use plans and <br />policies, including planned and protected agricultural lands, open space and parks, city- <br />centered growth policies, urban growth boundaries, and any physical or geological <br />constraints. <br />Regional policies incorporated into Projections since 2002, are assumed to go into effect by <br />2010, and therefore have some effect on regional housing growth estimates in the 2007-2014 <br />RHNA period. Regional policies assume that there will be increased housing growth in <br />existing urbanized areas, near transit stations and along major public transportation corridors. <br />These regional policies are consistent with state housing policies to promote infill <br />development, environmental and agricultural protection and efficient development patterns. <br />The impacts of regional policy assumptions in Projections are: a) potential environmental and <br />agricultural resource protection by directing growth away from existing open and agricultural <br />lands; b) the encouragement of efficient development patterns through increased infill <br />development and higher densities in existing communities; and c) the potential for increased <br />transportation choices, e.g., walking and public transit, through more housing development <br />near transit and jobs. <br />The household estimates in Projections account for ali people living in housing units, <br />including students. Thus, the portion of the student population that occupies part of a local <br />jurisdiction's housing stock is counted as such and as a source of future household formation. <br />The portion of the student population that occupies "group quarters," such as college <br />dormitories, are not included in household population counts. This is consistent with state <br />policy regarding RHNA that excludes "group quarters" from being counted as housing units. <br />Household growth is used as a factor, as opposed to existing units or total units, to ensure that <br />additional housing is not planned where there are existing concentrations of homes in the <br />region, but rather where growth is anticipated to occur. In this way household growth as a <br />_~ugust 2007, Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.