|
San Francisco Bay Area Draft Regional Housing Needs :111ocation, 4~' Revision
<br />Diane Dillon, Supervisor, County of Napa, Napa
<br />Howard Siegel, Community Partnership Mgr., County of Napa, Napa
<br />Amit Ghosh, Assistant Planning Director, San Francisco, San Francisco
<br />Doug Shoemaker, Mayor's Office of Housing, City of San Francisco, San Francisco
<br />Amy Tharp, Director of Planning, City of San Francisco, San Francisco
<br />Duane Bay, Housing Director, San Mateo County, San Mateo
<br />Andrea Ouse, City Planner, Town of Colma, San Mateo
<br />Mark Duino, Planner, San Mateo County, San Mateo
<br />Laurel Prevetti Deputy Dir., Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, City of San Jose, Santa
<br />Clara
<br />Regina Brisco, Housing Planner, City of Gilroy, Santa Clara
<br />Steve Piasecki, Planning Director, City of Cupertino, Santa Clara
<br />Matt Walsh, Principal Planner, Solano County, Solano
<br />Chuck Dimmick, Councilmember (Vacaville) Solano City/County Coord. Council, Solano
<br />Eve Somjen, Assistant Director, City of Fairfield, Solano
<br />Mike Moore, Community Development Dir., City of Petaluma, Sonoma
<br />Jake MacKenzie, Council Member, City of Rohnert Park, Sonoma
<br />Jennifer Barrett, Deputy Director -Planning, County of Sonoma, Sonoma
<br />Geeta Rao, Policy Director, Nonprofit Housing of Northern California, Stakeholder
<br />Kate O'Hara, Regional Issues Organizer, Greenbelt Alliance, Stakeholder
<br />Margaret Gordon, Community Liaison, West Oakland Indicators Project, Stakeholder
<br />Andrew Michael, Vice President, Bay Area Council, Stakeholder
<br />Paul B. Campos, VP, Govt. Affairs & Gen. Counsel, Home Builders Association, Stakeholder
<br />V. The Regional Needs Allocation Methodology
<br />The RHNA methodology assigns each jurisdiction in the Bay Area its share of the region's total
<br />housing need. The methodology includes an allocation tool that is a mathematical equation that
<br />consists of weighted factors. There are also "rules" regarding allocation of units by income, how
<br />to handle units in spheres of influence, voluntary transfers of units, and subregions. The
<br />methodology encompasses these distinct components of the methodology.
<br />In their recommendation, the HMC members considered local land use plans and policies,
<br />regional growth policies and the state's housing polices, as expressed in the state mandated
<br />RHNA objectives.
<br />1. Weighted Factors
<br />Factors in the allocation methodology are the mathematical variables that partly determine
<br />how the regional housing need (RHN) is allocated to local jurisdictions. The factors reflect:
<br />1) state mandated RHNA objectives; 2) RHNA statutory requirements; 3) local policy and 4)
<br />regional policy.
<br />In the methodology, each factor is given priority relative to the others. Priority is established
<br />through "weighting" in the formula. For example, if one of the factors, e.g., household
<br />growth, is determined to be more important than another factor, e.g., transit, the methodology
<br />can give household growth a higher weight than transit in the formula. The methodology may
<br />also equally weight the factors, therefore ensuring that all the factors are of equal priority.
<br />The factors and weights (expressed in parenthesis) are:
<br />_~ugust 200?, Page 6
<br />
|