Laserfiche WebLink
San Francisco Bay s~lrea <br />Draft Regional Housing Needs .allocation, 4~" Revision <br />between jobs and housing. <br />(4) Allocate a lower proportion of housing need to <br />an income category when a jurisdiction already <br />has a disproportionately high share of <br />households in that income category, as <br />compared to the countywide distribution of <br />households in that category from the most <br />recent decennial United States census. <br />• Promote economic and fiscal health <br />• Conserve resources, promote sustainability, and <br />improve environmental quality <br />• Protect public health and safety <br />III. Statutory Factors & Survey of Factors <br />1. Statutory Factors <br />The RHNA statutes delineate specific factors that had to be considered for inclusion in <br />the allocation methodology, including: <br />• Water and sewer capacity <br />• Land suitable for urban development or conversion to residential use <br />• Protected open space -lands protected by state and federal government <br />• County policies to protect prime agricultural land <br />• Distribution of household growth <br />• Market demand for housing <br />• City-centered growth policies <br />• Loss of affordable units contained in assisted housing <br />• High housing cost burdens <br />• Housing needs of farm workers <br />• Impact of universities and colleges on housing needs in a community <br />With the advice of the HMC, ABAG staff considered how to incorporate the statutory <br />factors into the allocation methodology, how to allocate units by income, and how to address <br />issues such as spheres of influence, the relationship to subregions, and voluntary transfers of <br />housing units between jurisdictions. Their goal has been to develop an allocation <br />methodology that is consistent with the RHNA objectives and statutory requirements while <br />also reflecting local conditions and the regional goals for growth. <br />See Section IV. 1. Weighted Factors for a detailed description of how the factors are <br />included in the recommended methodology. <br />2. Survey of Factors <br />On September 15, 2006, ABAG sent a memorandum and survey form to each planning <br />director of every local jurisdiction in the region. The memorandum explained the use of <br />factors in the RHNA allocation methodology, described the status of the HMC's <br />deliberations, set forth the criteria for using a factor in the methodology, and solicited local <br />input on the statutory factors and suggestions for additional factors. ABAG received <br />responses from 42 local jurisdictions (A detailed summary of survey responses is available at <br />http:!i~~ti~-w.abag_ca.~-Ulanning;`housinaneeds or by contacting ABAG staff.) <br />august 2007, Page 3 <br />