My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 1-4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
030408
>
15 ATTACHMENT 1-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2008 3:59:48 PM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 01-04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 11, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />In addition, while there are local conservation programs in eastern Alameda County that <br />are preserving endangered species and habitat, they lack the benefit of a coordinated <br />approach and vision that is broadly supported by local stakeholders and regulatory <br />agencies. Some conservation programs have significant funds to contribute to broad <br />regional conservation efforts, but lack adequate direction on where and how to spend <br />these funds to maximize benefits to natural communities. <br />An approach that would facilitate coordination and expedite many mitigation projects and <br />conservation programs currently underway is to develop a regional conservation <br />strategy. The conservation strategy would coordinate an approach to mitigation for <br />voluntary use by project proponents in the environmental permitting process. As the <br />conservation strategy will be developed by and with the regulatory agencies, the result <br />will be a regional conservation strategy formally approved by those agencies. This will <br />substantially reduce uncertainty in the permitting process, if local agencies and private <br />developers follow the conservation strategy in their permitting process, and will result in <br />negotiations with regulatory agencies that will be expedited and streamlined. It will <br />assist early planning for local agencies and private developers by having pre-designated <br />conservation areas appropriate for mitigation for particular species or habitats, <br />prescribed ratios for mitigation, and generalized cost estimates related to acquisition and <br />management of required mitigation acreage located in the designated conservation <br />areas. <br />To be successful, the regional conservation strategy must be acceptable to a wide range <br />of stakeholders. We propose a transparent process to formulate the strategy with a wide <br />range of stakeholders, including the agricultural community, landowners, developers, <br />environmental groups, and local agencies. Stakeholders will work with local planning <br />staff, regulatory agencies, and an experienced consultant over an 18-month period to <br />develop the regional conservation strategy for East Alameda County. <br />The regional approach will save time and money while improving overall benefit to <br />species habitat in East Alameda County and providing connectivity with other important <br />adjacent areas that are in and suitable for conservation preserves. These include areas <br />extending throughout the Tri-Valley and would geographically connect with adjacent <br />natural areas and watersheds in Contra Costa, San Joaquin, and Santa Clara counties. <br />Another important benefit is that environmental permitting for ongoing projects would not <br />be delayed by the concurrent formulation of the regional conservation strategy. In fact, <br />access to key decision makers at the regulatory agencies would be enhanced during <br />strategy development due to their combined presence at the series of monthly meetings <br />that will be required during plan preparation. In addition, the conservation strategy <br />process would not extend or expand the regulatory authority of any of the participating <br />regulatory agencies, i.e., the strategy would not be used to require mitigation for projects <br />that otherwise would not require mitigation. <br />Participating cities and other local agencies would receive the following benefits: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.