My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 1-4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
030408
>
15 ATTACHMENT 1-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2008 3:59:48 PM
Creation date
2/29/2008 9:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 01-04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' ~ DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME <br />POST OFFICE BOX 47 <br />YOUNTVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94599 <br />(707)944-5500 <br />July 11, 2007 <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br />5 ° . ae' 4 <br />2800 COTTAGE WAY, Room W-2605 <br />SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95825 <br />(916) 414-6600 <br />To the Mayors and City Councilmembers of the Cities of Livermore, Dublin, and <br />Pleasanton, the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County, and Boards of Zone 7 and <br />Alameda County Congestion Management Association: <br />The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in coordination with the California Department of Fish <br />and Game, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, supports the development of <br />a regional conservation strategy for East Alameda County, and encourages the County, <br />local cities, and other pertinent agencies and districts in the Tri-Valley area to participate <br />in this planning process. It is anticipated that the conservation strategy, developed with <br />the participation of Federal, State, and local agencies and stakeholders in the Tri-Valley <br />would serve to coordinate biological preserves appropriate for mitigation of local land <br />use, transportation, and related infrastructure projects. The strategy would also <br />establish a coordinated biological framework upon which future regulatory actions will be <br />based. The conservation strategy would provide the biological basis and framework for <br />a permitting process and establish interim and long-term mitigation requirements and <br />designate Resource Agency approved conservation areas that will satisfy mitigation <br />requirements. The conservation strategy will describe how preserves will be <br />established, managed, and funded to assure they are permanently maintained. The first <br />conservation strategy was developed for the Santa Rosa area and completed in 2005. <br />This would be the second regional conservation strategy in the State and would be <br />formulated over the next 18 months. What follows is a brief overview of the purpose, <br />needs and benefits of the program, activities to date, and resources that participating <br />entities would need to contribute to develop the program. <br />There is a recognized need for a regional strategy to replace the present incremental, <br />case-by-case processing of environmental permits for infrastructure and other planned <br />development projects in East Alameda County. Public agencies and private developers <br />encounter delays and uncertainty regarding required mitigations that can prevent <br />projects from being completed on time and within budget. The end result is: <br />• Project mitigation and conservation programs in the area occur piecemeal and are <br />less effective at preserving natural resources; <br />• The limited capacity of County based mitigation banks leads to some mitigation <br />occurring outside the County providing no local benefit; and <br />The permitting process can be time consuming and costly to both the permitting <br />agencies and applicants, in part due to mitigation being developed and analyzed <br />on a case-by-case basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.