Laserfiche WebLink
ground floor so that they do not cantilever over the rear elevation (south); and 3) noted that the <br />shared property line of the Shell gas station is not accurate. Mr. Safreno informed the applicant <br />that the subject site has approximately 2-feet to gain if the line were readjusted. Staff has added <br />a condition of approval stating that a survey shall be conducted of the shared property line to <br />ensure its accuracy. <br />The applicant also provided staff with 13 letters of support for the project on October 4; which <br />can be found in Exhibit E. Staff notes that another letter of support for the project was provided <br />by Robert Byrd prior to noticing the project; which is also in Exhibit E. <br />As previously stated, because the plans were revised after noticing was sent, the unit sizes are <br />larger than what is reflected on the noticing. However, staff has not received any comments or <br />letters of opposition regarding the project. <br />PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br />The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development District and "considerations" to be addressed when reviewing a PUD development <br />plan. <br />1. Whether the plan is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general <br />welfare: <br />All on-site infrastructures shall be installed by the project developer with connections to <br />municipal systems in order to serve the site. Adequate storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water <br />service utilities are present near the development and are sufficient to serve the new <br />buildings. Public street access is provided to all structures for police, fire, and other <br />emergency response vehicles. The buildings are designed to meet the requirements of the <br />Building Code and other applicable City codes. The applicants would install ample <br />landscaping as part of the project. <br />Therefore, as conditioned, staff believes that the proposed plan is in the best interest of the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan: <br />The proposed project's land use, High Density Residential, conforms to the "High Density <br />Residential" Land Use Element designation for the project site. The General Plan land use <br />designation for the subject site is High Density Residential (greater than eight dwelling units <br />per gross acre). The proposed project, with 5 units on approximately .30 acres for a density <br />of 2.4 units per acre, would be consistent with this General Plan designation. The project <br />would also be consistent with the following General Plan policy in the Housing Element, "at <br />PUD-64, 4238 First Street LLC Planning Commission <br />Page 10 of 13 <br />