Laserfiche WebLink
Kelly Cousins was distressed to hear the City did not move to certify the signatures tonight, said <br />the referendum on the ballot is important and hoped the Council could continue to serve as a <br />protector of citizen rights. She also supported the City's efforts in campaign finance reform. <br />Brian Arkin voiced disappointment that the Linn family used deep pockets to interfere with <br />citizens and causing a resident to obtain private legal counsel and causing the City to prohibit <br />them from certifying the referendum to have a June election. He asked that the Council stand up <br />and say the behavior is against Pleasanton's community of character. <br />Karla Brown said it is shocking attorneys are getting involved in the referendum process, <br />believed the developer is using harsh tactics to fight the Council and its citizens, stated the City <br />must now use tax dollars to defend itself and she hoped for the referendum to go to the ballot. <br />Carolyn Newton said the lawsuit and restraining orders set a horrible precedent for the future of <br />our democratic process; that if the development is such a good deal they should not be afraid of <br />allowing people to vote. <br />Julie Testa said the one of the most shameful chapters of Pleasanton history is the Ponderosa <br />project referendum process and she sees this as a repeat of it. She hoped the Council will send <br />a clear message that the issue is not about the Oak Grove project but about standing up for the <br />citizens. She asked the Council rescind to approval of the project. <br />Richard Pugh asked the Council to promote freedom of speech and assembly, defend Article II <br />of the Constitution, protect free and unimpeded operation of the election code, and provide <br />leadership to re-energize the community of character. He asked that Commissioners and <br />Councilmembers protect City laws, specifically recommit to support the Election Code, disavow <br />any threatening behavior, and believed campaigns like "Do Not Sign" to be corrosive. <br />Michael Hamilton urged the Council to act as quickly as legally possible on the Oak Grove <br />referendum and cited the business practices of the developer. Regarding campaign spending <br />he did not support restrictions, supported on-line access to campaign information and <br />recommended a community forum be held on a Sunday night prior to the election for candidates <br />to make their case and cite any wrongdoings. <br />Doug Miller said many have abused the right of property owners but he felt going to court to <br />obstruct a democratic process was very serious and asked the Council to rescind its decision <br />rather than letting attorneys and courts take control. <br />Mayor Hosterman thanked speakers for sharing their opinions and concerns. She said the <br />Council is precluded from engaging in public discussion for items not on the agenda, but said <br />the item will be on a future agenda. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />20. Reviewed and conceptual approved the play yard design with improvements to <br />Gingerbread Preschool; allocated $40,000 from the City's Capital Improvement Reserve <br />for the contract amendment with Keller Mitchell & Co. for the development of construction <br />documents for Gingerbread Preschool Play Yard, CIP #067015; and authorized facility <br />improvements from the City's Facility Renovation Fund, not to exceed $345,000 <br />City Council Minutes 5 January 15, 2008 <br />