Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Resolution No. PC-2007-45 approving PCUP-203 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />Matters Continued for Decision <br /> <br />a. PCUP-196, Rachelle Nguyen <br />Application for a conditional use permit to operate an indoor recreation facility for up to <br />40 children at the property located at 7071-7073 Commerce Circle. Zoning for the <br />property is I-G-40,000 (General Industrial) District. <br /> <br />Ms. Soo presented the staff report and summarized the background, scope, and revised layout of <br />this application. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that she had visited the site and added that one nearby building had a <br />patio with a gate and a fence. She inquired whether or not staff would recommend a fence and <br />gate in front of this building as well. Ms. Decker noted that the changes to the floor plan <br />addressed the Planning Commission’s concern regarding safety issues and that gating or fencing <br />in the front area had not been considered; staff did not believe gating and fencing would be <br />necessary. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Rachelle Nguyen, applicant, noted that she was available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank thanked the applicant for working with staff to address the Commission’s <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Ms. Nguyen noted that they also worked with the corporate office, looking at many layouts, to <br />find a solution that would provide a safe pedestrian walkway for the children. She noted that <br />with this walkway, the person at the cash register up front still has the ability to monitor the rear <br />entrance and can see people entering and exiting the building from the back. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum thanked the applicant for the modifications and added that she was much <br />more comfortable about this application. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman addressed a procedural issue, stating that at the last meeting after the Commission <br />voted, Commissioner Olson made a motion to reconsider the decision, which was seconded, <br />followed by a majority vote (4-1, Fox dissenting). She indicated that at this time, the process <br />would be to reconsider the original motion made at the last meeting by Commissioner Blank and <br />seconded by Commissioner Olson to make the required conditional use findings as listed in the <br />staff report and to approve the project subject to the conditions of approval, with the <br />modifications as spelled out by Ms. Decker. If majority vote to uphold the approval at the last <br />meeting, the decision would stand; otherwise, the Commission should then consider staff’s <br />recommendation made at this evening’s hearing. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2007 Page 6 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />