PC 111407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank wished to call the Commissioners’ attention to the public hearing procedure contained in the agenda. “The applicant will be asked to make a presentation, if desired, or answer questions. Applicant presentations should be no longer than 10 minutes…. Speakers are requested to give their names and addresses for the public record and to keep their testimony to no more than five minutes each, with minimum repetition of points made by previous speakers.” While he wanted to ensure that everyone had an opportunity to speak, he believed the Commission did a disservice to the audience by not having any limits at all on the speakers’ times. He believed the Commission should be sensitive to following the established procedures as closely as possible. 8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION a. Future Planning Calendar No discussion was held or action taken. b.Actions of the City Council No discussion was held or action taken. c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator No discussion was held or action taken. 9. COMMUNICATIONS No discussion was held or action taken. 10. REFERRALS No discussion was held or action taken. 11. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S INFORMATION Commissioner Narum inquired about the status of the California Splash permit. She indicated that it appears there has been no activity in the area for a long time and the site looks neglected. Ms. Decker replied that the City was still undergoing consideration of that project. The applicants had some prohibitive financing problems, and it is anticipated that the applicants will come forward with requests for additional permits and inspections on the work done to date. Staff would research the status of that project and report back to the Planning Commission. If the building permits were to expire or due diligence, the applicants would have to come back for a use permit. 12. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Fox adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 12:06 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2007 Page 33 of 34