Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Blank moved to find that there were no new or changed circumstances or <br />information that would require additional CEQA review of the project and that the <br />proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan and Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan; to make the PUD findings as listed in the staff report; and to <br />recommend approval of PUD-32, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B, <br />with the following modifications: <br />1. Modify Condition No. 38 to indicate that in addition to federal holidays, no <br />construction shall be allowed on State holidays and that residents will be notified of <br />any addition to construction hours prior to 8:00 a.m. and past 5:00 p.m., to which they <br />may express their objection and decline the request; <br />2. Modify Condition No. 17 to add the Tri-Valley Conservancy and the Livermore <br />Agricultural Mitigation Fees as examples of fees which the applicants may need to <br />pay; <br />3. Add a condition that the applicant will create all applicable open space easements and <br />any other easements required by the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan; <br />4. Modify Condition No. 5 to delete the 2,900-square-foot addition to the existing home <br />on the one-acre lot; <br />5. Add a condition that the dark retaining wall color will be softened subject to the <br />approval of the Planning Director; and <br />6. Modify Condition No. 57 to clarify the tree removal process. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, and Olson. <br />NOES: Commissioners Fox and Pearce. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2007-48 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />a. Tabled motion: Consideration of whether to take the motion made by Commissioner <br />Olson on July 11, 2007 from the table; if majority support to do so, then consider <br />Commissioner Olson’s July 11, 2007 motion. <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />b. Discussion of the types of projects to be placed on the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />Speakers’ Time During Public Hearing <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2007 Page 32 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />