PC 101007 - Laserfiche WebLink

added that the CC&R’s generally reflect the language of the PUD guidelines and can be more restrictive. At Chairperson Fox’s request, staff would provide the PUDs and PUD modifications and would examine those documents as part of the document preparation. Commissioner O’Connor expressed concern about approving anything that would conflict with the CC&R’s. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding whether there was a homeowners association for this PUD, Ms. Decker indicated that she did not know. Commissioner O’Connor noted that he believed there was none. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR a. PAUP-4, Jennifer A. Hosterman Application for an animal use permit to allow a red-tailed hawk to be kept in the rear yard accessory structure of an existing residence located at 2922 Chardonnay Drive. Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District. This item was continued by staff to a future Commission meeting. b. PUD-64, 4238 First Street, LLC Application for Planned Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval to: (1) rezone an existing 13,161-square-foot parcel from RM-25 (Multiple-Family Residential) District to PUD-HDR (Planned Unit Development – High Density Residential) District; (2) renovate the existing home; and (3) construct four detached single-family units ranging from 1,500 square feet to 1,750 square feet at the property located at 4238 First Street. Commissioner Blank moved to make the finding that the proposed PUD development plan is covered by the previously approved Final Environmental Impact Report for the Downtown Specific Plan; that the proposed PUD development plan and the related material, Exhibit A, is consistent with the General Plan, the Downtown Specific Plan, and the purposes of the PUD ordinance, to make the PUD findings listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval to the City Council of PUD-64, subject to the development plan as shown in Exhibit A and the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Narum regarding whether the home at 4238 First Street would be sprinklered, Ms. Decker replied that it would be sprinklered depending on how far down to the studs the renovation went. It is the City’s policy that if a renovation included demolition of the interior down to the studs, the home must be retrofitted with a sprinkler system. Commissioner Narum did not see a mention of sprinklers in the staff report. Ms. Decker noted that a condition could be added to state that if the interior of the structure were demolished such that the studs are exposed, the house would be required to be sprinklered. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 10, 2007 Page 7 of 21