Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Acting Chairperson Blank suggested that the Traffic Engineer identify a standard set of issues to <br />be addressed. Ms. Decker noted that would be possible, and would bring that request to the <br />Traffic Engineer with the end result of having it become part of the City’s policy for projects. <br /> <br />AM/PM <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce recalled Chairperson Fox’s question about the U.S. Gas station turning <br />into AM/PM and agreed that the paint on that building was peeling badly and looked terrible. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker stated that the question had been directed to Code Enforcement and that she would <br />look into the matter and provide further information at a future meeting. <br /> <br />RV’s <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor had watched a City Council several weeks prior and recalled that the <br />Mayor brought up the issue of RVs. He requested follow-up information regarding RV parking. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Blank suggested placing that issue on a future Planning calendar. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that staff could address the status of that ordinance. She noted that there had <br />been a collaborative effort between Code Enforcement and the Planning Department to identify <br />the problem areas in town with respect to parking. She added that language distinctions between <br />RVs and fifth wheels were being addressed. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that when PUD-81-28-05M returns to the Commission, she would <br />like to see background information about what existed before the wall was built. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker replied that a comprehensive package of prior approvals, easements, <br />correspondence, and background information would be presented. She added that the Planning <br />Director, Jerry Iserson, would be presenting the project. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O’Connor regarding if the adjacent property owner <br />had prescriptive rights over the Pereira property. Ms. Harryman did not believe the City would <br />opine on whether one private party had a prescriptive easement over the other. <br /> <br />b.Actions of the City Council <br /> <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 10, 2007 Page 20 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />