My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 (3)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
011508
>
01 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2008 11:37:15 AM
Creation date
1/11/2008 11:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
same picture which was taken in the middle of lots 43 and 44, said there will be massive <br />grading, the trees in the foreground will be buried by 30 feet of fill and houses everywhere. He <br />presented a picture of what the area would look like after development, with 750 cubic yards of <br />dirt put on the park, he highlighted Condition 38 which indicates design guidelines approved by <br />the Council and asked the City to be straight-forward and consistent in what it approved. <br />Joe Ely said Pleasanton has requested Livermore produce a full EIR before the development of <br />the FBO park proceeds and they have not been responsive to the request. He also heard the <br />airport has conducted noise monitoring but has not shared information, urged the Council to do <br />everything it can to stop Livermore in proceeding with its plans to outsource airport operations <br />and contract for the development of a 10-acre FBO park. He said he has listened to airport <br />management and Livermore Councilmembers claim they want to maintain the recreational <br />nature of the airport and simply provide hanger space for tenants. However, the minimum <br />standards call for 7,500 square feet of building for crew and passenger services, a 9,000 square <br />foot administration building, hanger space for servicing large planes, and hangers much larger <br />than the 900 square foot size commonly required for smaller aircraft. They claim that the FBO <br />will result in fewer operations; however, their own projections call fora 35% increase in fuel <br />sales with 2/3 of this being for jet fuel. He questioned their real intentions and objections of their <br />plan and about who the real beneficiaries are, and he asked the Council to focus on the cost to <br />those living by the airport in their diminished health and safety, property values, and quality of <br />life. <br />Anne Childs spoke in favor of petitions for a referendum against the Oak Grove development <br />and for the initiative to preserve the remaining hills around Pleasanton. <br />Judy Symcox advocated for the overworked East Valley Avenue, said money and plans have <br />been in place for Stoneridge extension, felt the traffic on Valley between Santa Rita and Stanley <br />will never get relief until the extension goes through. She thanked the City for the recent band- <br />aids but they will not change the number of cars and volume in the area. <br />Steve Rego echoed Joe Ely's comments, asked that an EIR be done prior to an FBO is <br />considered, said he gets the brunt of the take-off's from the airport, and if expanded, they could <br />fly left and over the heart of the City which would compromise everyone. He moved to the City <br />14 years ago from Hayward, did not have a problem with small planes but it is a completely <br />different issue with jets. <br />Ronald Marovich thanked Council and staff for the holiday decorations, which he felt were <br />superb. <br />Jerry Pentin, member of Keep Our Park group, said they are public park advocates that support <br />the Council's approval of a new 500 acre park at Oak Grove and to oppose the referendum <br />which would force the City to give back the new public park. He said they have worked to urge <br />voters to become informed prior to signing petitions and understand the unintended <br />consequences of the referendum and initiative. Some consequences are that the City would <br />have to give back the 500 acres of oak woodland habitat, miles of public trails and the public <br />restroom and staging area which are to be gifted to the City for free. The number of homes <br />would be reduced from 98 to 52 and residents would not have access to the hillsides in the east. <br />He felt petition gatherers have used misleading statements and doctored photographs and they <br />feel eventually voters will make decisions based on the truth. He referred to an ad in the <br />Pleasanton Weekly quoting Senator Diane Feinstein to infer that people should not be living in <br />Oak Grove; that local officials should change zoning laws to restrict residents from fire prone <br />City Council Minutes 5 December 4, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.