09 ATTACHMENT 3 - Laserfiche WebLink

:Ylarch 23, 2006 Page 6 N2. Working with the resource list developed in N1, review existing population/acreage ratios to determine community park adequacy in terms of Pleasanton standards, taking into account any planned development of additional community park facilities. N3. Consult with staff of the Recreation and Park Department to confine findings in N2. Discuss with staff the current relationship between any shortfall in community park space and observed physical impacts on the parks. N4. Estimate aggregate demand for/use of community park resources from among the residents of the three proposed projects. Determine whether demand from the three projects would contribute to a shortfall in community park space or increase any existing shortfall estimated in N2. N5. Identify potential mitigations in consultation with service providers. O. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC The analysis of cumulative traffic impacts will be conducted by Dowling Associates along the lines described in their Approach of May 27: Step 6. Model rerun with Oak Grove, Lund Ranch II and Spotorno projects: Modify Citywide build-out model scenario to include the Oak Grove, Lund Ranch II and Greenbriar/Spotorno projects' land use quantities. Run this modified build-out scenario and determine future traffic volumes and the resulting AM and PM peak hour LOS for the 27 study intersections. With respect to Greenbriar/Spotorno, the methodology agreed upon between staff and consultants calls for analyzing Spotorno Flat traffic as part of the Lund 2 cumulative traffic analysis, but with each project's quantified share estimated. If the cumulative analysis identifies impacts, then Greenbriar/Spotorno would share in mitigation measures according to its proportion of the cumulative impact. The Dowling budget proposed in their May 27 Approach includes the cumulative analysis. Shares of cumulative traffic will be calculated for each project. P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Individual project impacts on utilities (water supply and distribution, sewage collection, and storm water management) would be addressed in the relevant project impact sections of the EIRs. Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment. Cumulative impacts of the three projects on water supply and wastewater treatment can be discussed in light of in-progress updates of the City's water supply and wastewater master plans, work that is being conducted in tandem with the General Plan update. Staff of the Department of Public Works have agreed to consult with the EIR consultant in the evaluation of cumulative impacts for the purposes of this analysis. Recent legislation requiring long term identification of water supply resources under the provisions of SB610 and SB221 appear not to be required in view of the fact that the three `( i(~r: .', a.~ ~-i .r t,:ertrner.GJ J[,~~, :7;u ,~z~~:x,. ..'.~, ~i.;il`; ~ i;;c. , ~ ,~+L.~~,;:~{1 (<,; i a.~: d J ~~ 1-', , ir, _ i~rr:„~ is