My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
121807
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2007 4:00:43 PM
Creation date
12/12/2007 3:57:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/18/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the Tri-Valley, San Ramon has a voluntary expenditure limit pledge. The expenditure <br />limit is re-established each election based on the cost of two mailings to every <br />registered voter. For the 2005 election, the voluntary expenditure limit was $21,544. At <br />the close of the nomination period, the San Ramon City Clerk issues a press release <br />advising which candidates have signed the voluntary expenditure limit pledge, and <br />which ones have not. San Ramon's City Attorney advises that all candidates have <br />historically signed the voluntary pledge, and monitoring is undertaken by interested third <br />parties [not the City of San Ramon]. <br />Providing Direction to Staff about Voluntary Expenditure Limits. If the City <br />Council considers a voluntary pledge by candidates to adhere to a <br />campaign expenditure limit, staff would need direction about: <br />(a) amount of the expenditure limit (e.g. $1 per registered voter); <br />(b) whether and how to notify the public about which candidates took the <br />pledge; and <br />(c) whether the City should try to monitor compliance. <br />Political Action Committees / Independent Expenditure Committees. <br />Under Federal election law, groups commonly known as "political action committees" or <br />PACs are specifically defined to include a "nonconnected committee", which committees <br />often undertake "independent expenditures" in support or against candidates for Federal <br />office. An "independent expenditure" means "an expenditure by a person: (A) expressly <br />advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate; and (B) that is not <br />made in concert or cooperation with or at the request or suggestion of such candidate, <br />the candidate's authorized political committee, or their agents, or a political party or its <br />agents." (See 2 United States Code §431(17).) <br />Similar to Federal law, under State law, "Independent Expenditure Committees" can pay <br />for communications (e.g. printed mailers, advertisements, etc.) which support or oppose <br />a candidate or a candidate's position if the group making such communications are not <br />doing so at the behest of a candidate or candidate's committee (e.g. not controlled or <br />directed by the candidate or the candidate's committee). (See Govemment Code <br />§82031.) <br />Independent expenditures in support or opposition to a candidate are not required to be <br />reported by the candidate or the candidate's committee in their Campaign Statements. <br />However, Independent Expenditure Committees are subject to State reporting <br />requirements regarding contributions and expenditures, which are submitted to the Fair <br />Political Practices Commission and made available for public inspection. (See <br />Govemment Code §§84101(c), 84200 et. seq.) <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.