My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072507
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 072507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:57 PM
Creation date
10/29/2007 9:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/25/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O’Connor expressed concern about making an exception for what appears <br />to be ordinary apartments because they form part of a senior housing project. He stated <br />that if that would be the case, then other senior housing facilities should not be counted, <br />and the Hacienda Business Park TOD units should not be counted as well. He noted that <br />the low-cost housing that have been constructed in the past, a great majority of which <br />were for seniors, have been counted. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that there are about 60 units in the Staples Ranch assisted <br />living proposal come with garages. She stated that if the unit has a garage and, therefore, <br />a car, there would be an impact on infrastructure in terms of traffic and transportation, <br />and the units should be counted. She added that she supported transferring the 240 units <br />towards TOD but that those units with garages should be counted as the whole point of <br />the housing cap is to manage infrastructure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that these units would not be using other infrastructure such <br />as schools. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that the Commission can make a recommendation for the <br />240 units; however, things could change between now and when the final plans are <br />presented, and the actual number of available units would not be known until then. <br /> <br />The Commission then reviewed the Draft Land Use Element text and made the following <br />recommendations on the redlined version: <br /> <br />Text <br /> <br />Page 2-1 <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that she liked placing Sustainability at the beginning of <br />the text. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox stated that she would like to add back the deleted text in the last <br />paragraph, “In general, major business parks, regional shopping, quarry operations, and <br />freeways are located at the periphery of the City, while housing tends to be more <br />centrally located.” <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that the City is looking into more decentralized housing with <br />residential projects by BART and TODs. Commissioner O’Connor noted that the <br />approximately 1,000 units near BART are certainly on the periphery. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Blank’s inquiry if the Introduction is part of the General <br />Plan, Ms. Stern stated that it looks at the existing conditions. She explained that the <br />sentence was struck because there has been an increase in peripheral residential <br />development since the 1996 Plan, such as those along Foothill Road. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 25, 2007 Page 14 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.