My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072507
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 072507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:57 PM
Creation date
10/29/2007 9:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/25/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairperson Fox inquired if a vote of the people of Pleasanton and the County would be <br />necessary to adjust the UGB. Ms. Stern replied that she cannot give a legal opinion but <br />that she believes that the answer is yes to both. Ms. Harryman confirmed that it would be <br />correct to say that a vote of the people of Pleasanton and the County would be required. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if the property is within Pleasanton’s sphere of <br />influence. Ms. Stern said yes. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Kelly’s inquiry regarding whether the City expects to expand its <br />sphere of influence to provide sewer services down Sunol Boulevard to the San Francisco <br />Water District property, Ms. Stern replied that the City has no plans to expand its sphere <br />of influence at this time and that it does not provide services outside of its UGB. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce thanked Ms. Stern for clarifying the language and removing <br />redundancies, making the text more direct and much easier to read. Ms. Stern noted that <br />Sally Maxwell also worked hard on editing the text. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether it would be appropriate not to count the <br />240 Staples Ranch units under the cap as long as they are used for affordable housing or <br />TOD. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor commented that this should be discussed not because more <br />units should be in TOD but because there are 2,007 units within the City that have not yet <br />been allocated. He added that the Commission could still allocate more units into TOD <br />housing if it desired. He noted that the Staples Ranch proposal does not consist of only <br />assisted-living units but is a three-stage living facility, of which 240 units would be like <br />apartments. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Blank’s inquiry if the Commission could make a <br />recommendation on what it wants done with the 2,007 units, Ms. Stern noted that the <br />Commission had already preliminarily allocated 1,600 of these units at its earlier <br />consideration of the Draft Element. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that it would be helpful for Pleasanton to allocate more units <br />for TOD and affordable housing. Commissioner O’Connor stated that in addition to the <br />200 of the 1,600 that the Commission had designated as placeholders for future units, <br />there are an additional 400 units available under the 2,007 total units. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that the baseline threshold that Hacienda needs to make its <br />project viable includes its 330 allocations plus the 400 units that remain unallocated and <br />the remainder from Staples Ranch. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 25, 2007 Page 13 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.