PC 092607 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. August 8, 2007 Commissioner Pearce noted that Commissioner Narum was not in attendance to make changes to the Minutes of August 8, 2007. She noted that the last sentence of the third paragraph on page 20 should be modified to read as follows: “… did not believe it would be necessary to check the other M.T.O. sites with respect to how they operate and/or the community’s reaction to their presence.” Ms. Decker advised that an email from Commissioner Narum had been placed on the dais containing her changes to the Minutes and presented the changes to the Minutes, as follows: ? Add the following language after the first sentence of the fifth full paragraph on page 17: “She inquired if there had been a traffic study assuming whatever development was planned for various parcels.” ? The last sentence on of the second paragraph on page 20 should be modified to read as follows: “She believed the fencing should could fit in better to the rural atmosphere of the area, and that it could should be less ornate.” Ms. Decker noted that Commissioner Narum concurred with an amendment made by Chairperson Fox on a statement made by Commissioner Narum in the fifth paragraph on page 22 relating to storypoles. Commissioner Blank moved to approve the minutes as amended. Commissioner O’Connor seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, O’Connor, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. The motion passed, and the Minutes of August 8, 2007, were approved as amended. b. August 22, 2007 Commissioner O’Connor advised that the first sentence of the fourth full paragraph on page 10 should be modified to read as follows: “Commissioner O’Connor noted that he was not opposed to reducing the parking requirement if there were evidence that the TOD-type developments could work with less parking.and He added that the Commission….” PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 26, 2007 Page 2 of 20