PC 092607 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2007-40, denying Case PAP-108, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval of Case PADR-1698, was entered and adopted as motioned. At this point, the appellant indicated that he had a question of the Commission. Commissioner Blank moved to reopen the public hearing for the purpose of answering the appellant's question, but not for the purpose of reconsidering the item. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. The motion passed. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mr. Long requested that the Planning Commission pose the question to the applicant that upon completion of the work required, there would be no further construction. It had come to his attention that the applicant may modify the bedroom by pushing it out over the main garage. Commissioner Blank noted that the applicant would need to come to the Planning Department for that action. Ms. Decker noted that minor modifications were reviewed by staff if they met all the zoning development standards for straight-zoned property and that they would only go through the Zoning Administrator process. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether it must be performed within the eight-month timeline, Ms. Decker replied that if this project were to be completed and the applicant wished to do further work, that would be considered to be an administrative design review to be brought before the Zoning Administrator. If it fit within the development standards for this zone, then it would be given aseven-day notice. It would be likely that one of the concerned neighbors who had been noticed would request a hearing before the Zoning Administrator and then before the Planning Commission if they were dissatisfied with the Zoning Administrator's decision. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 26, 2007 Page 16 of 20