RES 07152 - Laserfiche WebLink

slight traffic effects would be reduced. Impacts on residential streets in the area, not found to be significant for the Original Project, would also be reduced under Alternative 4. For these reasons, Alternative 4 may be seen as the environmentally superior alternative. VI. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR Findings and Recommendations Regarding Significant Project-Level and Cumulative Impacts Which are Avoided or Mitigated to aLess-Than-Significant Level The discussion of the effects of the mitigation measures recommended to address significant project-level and cumulative impacts of the Environmentally Superior Project also includes descriptions of the provisions developed by the City as part of the Environmentally Superior Project's conditions of project approval. These provisions, reflected in the Mitigation Monitoring and Implementation Plan (MMIP), serve to ensure the appropriate implementation of the recommended mitigation measures Aesthetic and Visual Resources Effect on the existing visual character of the site (DEIR, pp. 70-71, 75 and 355-356; Conditions 23-25, 30, 33, 34, 36, and 54 of PUD-33; MMIP A 1). a. Potentiallmgact. Infrastructure elements on the site (streets and private drives; utility elements, including pumping stations, and water tanks; and other public or quasi-public facilities) may present an unattractive appearance unless adequate screening is provided. b. Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided for in the Mitigation Monitoring and Implementation Program: Implement Oak Grove Planned Unit Development (PUD-33) Mitigation Measure A1. c. Findings. Based on the EIR and the entire record before the City, the City finds that: (i) Effects of Mitigation. The Environmentally Superior Project's potential impacts related to the visual impact of the construction of infrastructure on views toward the site will be mitigated to Page 12 of 45