Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Olson would like staff to work on the issues and indicated that he was not <br />prepared to vote on this item at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson moved to continue this item to the June 27, 2007, meeting. <br />Chairperson Fox seconded the motion, with an amendment to allow the public <br />hearing to remain open. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that staff will return on June 27, 2007 with answers to some of the <br />questions. She cautioned the Commission that staff was not prepared to request that the <br />applicant reconstruct or re-do visual analyses that were not acceptable to some of the <br />residents who had testified. After examining the visual analyses, staff believed that they <br />had been prepared and provided according to the standards required in the industry. She <br />noted that staff utilized very capable consultants; with respect to the issues raised <br />regarding peer review, she reminded the Commission that the EIR was a City document <br />and was not the same as a project coming forward with studies provided by an applicant’s <br />consultant, for which the City oftentimes requires peer reviews. The City would not <br />peer-review its own consultant’s work. Staff would not be prepared to return to the <br />Commission with additional studies or evaluations as to the integrity of the work. Staff <br />believes that the work presented has integrity and asked the Commission to evaluate <br />whether the project could be certified based on the Final EIR and provide a <br />recommendation to the City Council. With respect to providing clarification on <br />comments regarding discrepancies or unclear language in the development agreement and <br />some of the conditions, two weeks was adequate time to return to the Commission with <br />additional information. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, O’Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: Commissioner Blank. <br />ABSENT: None. <br /> <br />The motion passed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox suggested addressing Item 8.d., Appointment of a Liaison <br />Commissioner to the Downtown Vitality Committee of the Pleasanton Downtown <br />Association before Item 7., Matters Initiated by Commission Members. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />d.Appointment to the Downtown Vitality Committee of the Pleasanton <br /> <br />Downtown Association <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired whether it would be appropriate for an alternate <br />Commissioner to be appointed and noted that he planned to attend the meetings anyway. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2007 Page 27 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />