Laserfiche WebLink
Another issue is fire access. Hearst Drive would be the primary point of access to the site, <br />but additional fire access roads have been created to the property into the Grey Eagle <br />area along the northern property line of Oak Grove and he described the proposed areas, <br />stating the City has a 25-foot wide public access easement running through the site. Due <br />to concerns, staff has worked to be sensitive to the fact that the access would go under a <br />private street and it would be going through a lot to be built on. They reached a <br />compromise which seems to be acceptable to the Grey Eagle homeowners, to the City <br />and to the Fire Department and he described the easement area location, material, width, <br />length, and connection to the Oak Grove property line and to one of the northern cul-de- <br />sacs. <br />Councilmember Sullivan questioned and confirmed that the EVA around the right side of <br />the property was a limited portion at 12-foot wide, the material has not yet been <br />determined, and the surface of the road would be resolved subject to the approval of the <br />City and Mr. Roberts. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned how the public would know where the EVA was, <br />and Mr. Iserson said in almost all cases people would have the ability to drive out on <br />Hearst Drive which is the safest and most improved egress from the development. The <br />EVA is not intended to be an egress for the neighbors but an access point for the Fire <br />Department to get into the site. However, this is not to say that people would not <br />necessarily use it once the gates were open, but they would be encouraged to use Hearst <br />Drive. He said there is another area on the opposite side where the City currently has a <br />water tank with an access road out to Benedict Court and Kottinger Ranch development. <br />This proposal would extend the road and connect to Lot 51 as another fire access road so <br />there would be two ways for the Fire Department to access the site. Mr. Iserson further <br />displayed the many trails on the development and staging area constructed near the <br />regional trail. <br />He said there have been many issues and concerns identified, they have worked to try <br />and address all issues, staff feels the EIR does an adequate job in identifying impacts and <br />mitigating those impacts, the reduction of 98 lots to 51 lots goes a long way to avoid many <br />of the impacts, and the environmentally superior plan chosen by the EIR is the plan the <br />applicant is proposing. A major public amenity would be the dedication of almost 500 <br />acres of open space with trails, there would be a conservation easement which would <br />guarantee the open space be maintained in perpetuity, affordable housing will either be <br />built by the developer off-site or in-lieu fees would be paid, the design guidelines are some <br />of the best seen that address development on a lot by lot basis, almost all trees will be <br />saved and many more planted, and staff believes the findings can be made for certification <br />of the EIR and approval of the PUD--that the EIR can be found to be adequate and staff <br />recommends ultimately that the Council approve the PUD development plan and <br />development agreement and housing agreement subject to conditions of approval, with <br />changes contained in the memo provided to Council. He said Planner Marion Pavan was <br />present, as well as Donna Decker, Principal Planner and the EIR consultant, Roberta <br />Mundy. <br />Mayor Hosterman called for a brief break at 9:24 p.m. and reconvened the regular meeting at <br />9:30 p.m. with all members present. <br />Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br />City Council Minutes 11 September 4, 2007 <br />