My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
101607
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2007 1:51:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2007 1:51:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The creation of a quiet zone in Pleasanton would require the installation of four- <br />quadrant gates at all of the downtown at-grade crossings. The upgrades are required <br />because the elimination of horn blowing increases the risks of an accident at the grade <br />crossings. The basic tenant of the quiet zone rule is that the end result must have less <br />of a risk then the beginning condition. In this case, the elimination of horn blowing <br />increases the risk factor, but the installation of four-quadrant gates lowers the risk below <br />the starting condition. The risk is reduced because when the existing two crossing. gates <br />are down, there is a possibility that a vehicle could drive around the gates and still cross <br />the railroad tracks. The addition of the two additional gates precludes this possibility. <br />An alternative to the four-quadrant gates is the installation of a median which would <br />extend back from the crossing gates and prevent cars from moving over -into the <br />opposite lane. This alternative is problematic on the streets because it blocks access <br />into existing driveways. It also does not provide the same level of protection as a ~four- <br />quadrant solution. <br />In addition to the quadrant gates, the City would need to provide fencing to prevent <br />pedestrians from crossing at St. John Street, Division Street, and Old Bernal Avenue. <br />Currently, pedestrians cross at these locations. even though the streets do not cross the <br />railroad lines.. The elimination of the train horns will eliminate the warning to the <br />pedestrians, and as a result, the crossings must be eliminated, or protected by <br />additional automatic gates. <br />Discussions with other cities in California that have installed gate systems have <br />provided a wide range of costs for the installation. The City of Pomona, for example, is <br />estimating $740,000 per intersection, which includes both afour-quadrant gate system <br />and a median. Campbell's crossing improvements were installed as part of a tight rail <br />system, and the City did not have any costs. Fremont is estimating $500,000 per four- <br />quadrant crossing. Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) staff have said that they can't <br />provide good estimates without having a developed design. They provided previous <br />costs for four-quadrant systems ranging from $150,000 to $1,000,000, depending on <br />the complexity of the system. Staff estimates the cost for the proposed four-quadrant <br />crossing gate, system will be $400,000 for each location. The actual costs are <br />determined after submittal of the project to the FRA and UPRR has prepared the design <br />of the four-quadrant system. The price varies based on the level of detection required, <br />the size of the gates, and the amount of train traffic. Overall estimated costs for the <br />installation at the four Pleasanton crossings range is $1.6 million, not including the <br />Castlewood crossing. In addition to the capital costs for the system, UPRR staff have <br />informed us that the City will also be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the <br />extra gates in the amount of $10,000 to $20,000 per year for each crossing. <br />In addition to the City paying the costs of the construction work, if the train operator is <br />no longer required to sound the horn, the regulations are intended to remove the failure <br />to sound the horn as a cause of action against the railroad in lawsuits involving <br />collisions at grade crossings within the quiet zone. As a result, there is some increased <br />liability to the City. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.