Laserfiche WebLink
Karen Isaacs, 5325 Ridgevale Road <br />Bonnie Shambin, 762 Bonita Avenue <br />All public comment is included as Exhibit E, attached to this staff report. <br />FINDINGS <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development <br />District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan <br />proposal. The Planning Commission must find that the proposed PUD development plan <br />conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, as listed below, before making its recom- <br />mendation to the City Council. <br />1. The proposed development is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare. <br />The proposed development, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards con- <br />cerning public health, safety, and welfare including vehicle access, geologic and flood <br />hazards. The project developer will install all on-site infrastructure with connections <br />to the municipal systems in order to serve the site. Adequate storm drain, sanitary <br />sewer, and water service utilities are present near the development and are sufficient <br />to serve the new buildings. Public street access is provided to all structures for police, <br />fire, and other emergency response vehicles. The buildings are designed to meet the <br />requirements of the Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. This <br />finding can therefore be made. <br />Z. The proposed development is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. <br />The proposed project's land use conforms to the "High Density Residential" land use <br />designation for the project site. The General Plan defines High Density Residential as <br />greater than eight dwelling units per acre. The proposed project, with five units on ap- <br />proximately .24 acres, conforms to this designation. The project site is located within <br />the Downtown Specific Plan area and conforms to the majority of programs and poli- <br />cies outlined in the plan. This finding can therefore be made. <br />3. The proposed development is compatible with previously developed properties in the <br />vicinity and the natural topographic features of the site. <br />The Downtown project site is surrounded by a variety of uses: single-family residen- <br />tial, multi-family residential, office, and commercial. The proposed development is <br />compatible with surrounding development. In addition, the subject site is relatively <br />flat and, currently, more than 75% of the site is paved. Only minimal grading is pro- <br />posed on-site for drainage purposes. Approval of the PUD will, therefore, not alter the <br />physical characteristics of the site. This finding can therefore be made. <br />4. The grading takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br />keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding to <br />have as minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br />Item 6. a., PUD-55 Page 10 of 12 July 11, 2007 <br />