PC 2006-33 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC-2006-33 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF BARBARA YOUNG FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND PARCEL MAP APPROVAL, AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-44 WHEREAS, Barbara Young has applied for Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning of an existing 2.91-acre parcel from Agriculture (A) District to Planned Unit Development -Low Density Residential (PUD-LDR) District and for Parcel Map approval to subdivide the existing lot into three parcels, measuring approximately 19,779 square feet, 50, 192 square feet, and 45,094 square feet, for three custom homes at 11249 Dublin Canyon Road; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public heazing of June 28, 2006, the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval for the Negative Declaration prepared for this project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed rezoning and Parcel Map are appropriate for the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the PUD development plan: The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare. As conditioned, the proposed development would meet City standards for street improvements and utility design. Adequate storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water service utilities are present in the azea surrounding the development and are sufFicient to serve the proposed development. All on-site infrastructures shall be installed by the project developer with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the site. The project will generate traffic loads that can be accommodated by the existing City streets and intersections in the area. Adequate access would be provided to all structures and units for police, fire, and other emergency response vehicles. The building would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and other applicable City codes. The proposed plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and, therefore, this finding can be made.