Laserfiche WebLink
±9 acres. These are within the Urban Growth Boundary which is being recommended for <br />change to Low Density Residential, and which is the special Happy Valley designation which <br />would allow for one unit per two acres. She said much of the 9 acres is sloped, but there are a <br />couple of flat areas where limited residential development might be appropriate. <br />Councilmember Sullivan confirmed with Ms. Stern that the narrow area was on the west side of <br />the freeway, south of Happy Valley Road, between Sunol Pleasanton Road and the freeway. <br />Ms. Stern displayed the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area and described an area south of <br />Staples Ranch around Martin, and said this was proposed to be a preliminary boundary for an <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan area. Staff has removed all gravel and industrial designations in <br />that area in anticipation of a future specific plan, they have a bubble which shows a designation <br />of Commercial, Industrial, Business Park, Mixed Use and Park, which represents the many uses <br />staff sees as being planned in the area. She also pointed out the change in the Zone 7 Lake <br />areas water management designation. She said the Applied Biosystems Campus on Sunol <br />Boulevard was currently General Industrial. The development better reflects a business park <br />development and staff is proposing that this be changed to a Business Park. Ms. Stern noted <br />they currently have a PUD which would cover development on there unless it was changed. <br />Councilmember McGovern confirmed the area could reflect the current uses as a business park <br />setting, but not to necessarily encourage development. She referred to the former PUSD <br />property in Ironwood of 22 acres, said it was for Public Institutional/Medium density housing and <br />PUSD has given up their option on that property. Therefore, the City has now designated it as <br />medium density residential, which is consistent with a future project coming forward from <br />Ponderosa. She presented the revised general plan map, said staff has added a paragraph on <br />sustainability, removed some detailed information about Public Facilities and Open Space, <br />updated and added areas of special interest, there is a new section on existing and future <br />specific plans and re-arranged the growth management section. There is a new land use <br />concept section which is a brief discussion of ideas of smart growth, mixed use development, <br />transit oriented development, and a general plan designation was updated to relocate some of <br />the background and trend information to make the intent of the designations clearer. <br />Mayor Hosterman opened the item for public comment. <br />Kay Ayala noted her involvement in the 29,000 unit cap put in place by the last General Plan, <br />worked for 4 years with San Francisco to reduce the number of units reserved where the <br />citizens voted and almost passed a measure that they would have purchased the property, said <br />she was very concerned about growth and felt it was a huge issue in the community. She said a <br />proposed initiative to lower the cap would pass, questioned why Pleasanton had to build in the <br />near future. She asked housing be scattered throughout town and asked that schools be kept a <br />small size and not overcrowd high schools. <br />Brian Arkin said he fought the battle during the 1996 General Plan to lower the units from 2,000 <br />to 581 and he wanted to see the housing cap reduced. Regarding the Transient Oriented <br />Development (TOD) at the Hacienda Business Park, he was opposed to the project and felt the <br />amount of traffic was getting worse. Regarding the definition of a unit, voters overwhelmingly <br />voted for astate-defined citywide housing cap of 29,000 housing units. <br />Steve Dunn, Legacy Partners said they are about to close on the Hanson property. He said he <br />looks forward to working on the East Pleasanton Specific Plan and urged the Council to <br />maintain flexibility and indicated they would soon be proposing a mixed use development. <br />City Council Minutes 9 August 21, 2007 <br />