PC-88-107 - Laserfiche WebLink

EXHIBIT 'A' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC-88-107 OCTOBER 12, 1988 1. The development shall be substantially as shown on the vesting tentative map tract 5945 on file with the planning department. 2. The utility and grading plans shall be as shown on the Preliminary S.D. and Grading Plan, dated August 1988, on file with the Planning Department, and as described in the letter from Bissell & Karn to the Planning Director dated September 2, 1988. Final design of all utility systems not located in streets shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director; approval shall be given both to the final improvement plans and to staked, "in the field" locations prior to actual construction. 3. The final map shall show the park (Lot B) expanded to include the roadway indicated to be dedicated. 4. The final map shall show all dedications necessary for Foothill Road widening/realignment as determined by the City Engineer, if not first done by other instrument. 5. Where commonly maintained "V-ditches" lie between common area and individual lots, the final map shall relocate property lines so that the "V-ditches" lie outside the individual lots, where feasible. 6. Where emergency access roads bisect two lots (e.g. 55 and 56, 32 and 33), a plan showing the fencing and landscaping details shall be submitted in conjunction with either the final map or the first house plan adjoining said access road submitted for review. These access roads shall be shown on the final map as common area, not easements. 7. The final map/improvement plan shall include all recommendations made by the project geologist and/or City reviewing geologist as a result of additional geologic studies to be completed prior to filing a final map for the project. The additional studies shall be those discussed in general at a meeting held on October 3, 1988, and determined necessary by the City's reviewing geologist. Should these additional studies indicate, in the determination of the Planning Director, instability/hazard zones not consistent with the prior reports and which would affect the project as proposed in a manner different from that disclosed in geologic reports done to date, the Planning Director may refer this project back to the City decision-makers for review and reapproval. 8. The project shall be subject to all conditions of approval of the final PUD development plan (Ordinance No. 1380). 9. This project shall be subject to all the conditions contained in the memorandum from the City Engineer dated 10-12-88. tr5945.res/sm