My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 053007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 053007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:18:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/30/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
building next to Owens Drive to be set back somewhat so it did not cross into the <br />residential area. She would like the design to avoid placing windows that would face into <br />the residential area. She liked the office buildings that serve as the two connections to <br />the freeway, but she would like them to be placed farther to the inside of the site in the <br />event that a potential BART track to Livermore required more right-of-way to be taken. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the positioning of the buildings were acceptable and <br />assumed that the developer has examined the easements and taken possible transit <br />easements into consideration. He supported putting the office buildings where they <br />should be off of I-580. He stated that if they were on top of an easement, it would be <br />extremely expensive to be moved later by BART. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that staff was sure the applicant has looked at any potential conflicts <br />with easements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the parking garages were acceptable and was in favor of <br />the four-story parking structure because there will be a lot of people working in these <br />buildings. He supported the addition of more trees, greenery, and other landscaping. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce liked the location of the parking garages and that they were spread <br />out somewhat. She supported sheltering the garages with a lot of trees. <br /> <br />Are the vehicular access points acceptable? <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that it would make sense to have many different points to <br />access and exit the buildings. She suggested shielding the structure with trees. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox expressed concern that the curve on Rosewood Drive by Borders <br />Bookstore was the site of a fatality; if people were not familiar with the area, they may <br />drive faster, thinking they were entering the freeway. She would like a mitigation done <br />to Rosewood Drive to avoid that situation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the vehicular access points were acceptable. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce believed the vehicle access points were good. <br /> <br />Is the layout of the parking areas acceptable? <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the layout of the parking areas were acceptable. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson suggested deleting the proposed four-story parking structure and <br />adding its parking spaces to the proposed parking garage to be located up against the <br />arroyo. He acknowledged that it would be a longer walk to the office building, but the <br />view would be improved. He understood Chairperson Fox’s point in wanting to <br />eliminate the four-story parking structure, but he would rather move it than eliminate it. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 30, 2007 Page 15 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.