My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052307
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 052307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:29:57 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:17:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/23/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
length restrictions. Ms. Soo confirmed that staff believed that visually, there was no <br />difference between a fifth-wheel trailer and a motorhome when they are covered. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired why there was a difference in the Code between trailers, <br />buses, and trucks of varying sizes. Ms. Harryman noted that she did not know but added <br />that when the Code was written, fifth wheels were not as large as they are today. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Narum regarding whether a motor home of <br />the same size would be allowable, Ms. Harryman confirmed that it would be allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that when he drove through the neighborhood, he saw several <br />similar vehicles and had the impression that the City was not enforcing the Code <br />consistently. Ms. Harryman noted that Code Enforcement responded on a complaint <br />basis and did not initiate enforcement actions on its own. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that she had seen a heavy-duty truck on the property as well as <br />another truck and inquired whether there was any restriction on the number of <br />commercial vehicles in a particular residential house. Ms. Decker advised that the Code <br />did not restrict the number of vehicles that a person may have and requested that the <br />Chair reserve that question for the applicant. She noted that the truck in question did not <br />exceed the one-ton limit and added that the applicants did not work out of their home. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding whether someone could live in a <br />motor home on a property, Ms. Decker noted that the Code did not allow people to live <br />within a motor home or a fifth wheel on a residential site because that would be construed <br />as habitable living area. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding whether this vehicle had been <br />stored on the subject site year-round or whether it had been stored off-site during the <br />rainy months, Ms. Soo replied that the vehicle had been parked at the site since the <br />Barragans purchased it at the end of 2006. <br /> <br />A discussion of the definitions of trailers, campers, and motor homes ensued. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding the date this section of the <br />Code was written, Ms. Harryman noted that it had last been amended in 1995. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding whether the subject fifth wheel <br />was considered to be a vehicle, Ms. Decker replied that if the fifth wheel were to be <br />parked in front of a house, the Vehicle Code would restrict its ability to be parked on the <br />street to 72 hours. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman noted that under the current Code, there could not be both a trailer and a <br />boat; there could only be one of each recreational vehicle. It excluded automobiles, <br />including a pickup truck. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2007 Page 6 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.