PC 052307 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairperson Fox noted that she cast the “No” vote because she was concerned about the slope stability and that the site was approximately 600 feet from the Calaveras Fault. She was also concerned about the issues brought forth in the geotechnical report regarding the drainage plan and because the homeowners association had not yet reviewed the plan or agreed to it. 7.MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioners Handbook Improvements Commissioner Blank noted that at the last meeting, there was considerable controversy about the contents of the Commissioners Handbook. He disclosed that he had discussed his concerns with Ms. Harryman, and he learned that the rules surrounding the Commissions were not required to be consistent among all the Commissions. He believed that because all the Commissions were vital to the functioning of the City, no Commission was more important than another. He believed the Planning Commission had a special burden because people spent hundreds of thousands of dollars as well as significant amounts of time preparing their applications and reports. He proposed that the Planning Commission consider soliciting former Planning Commissioners Trish Maas and Mary Roberts to review the Planning Commission section of the Commissioners Handbook and to work with staff to make recommendations to help clarify certain unclear sections of the Handbook. Chairperson Fox believed that when City Council removed the dual voting for liaison Commission members, it indicated that it wanted to ensure that all Commissions had consistency with City Council proceedings. Ms. Harryman advised that legally, commissions could have different rules. Commissioner Blank inquired whether the Commissioners would support Ms. Harryman examining this issue further. Commissioner Narum noted that she would support that and expressed concern about a Commissioner being able to continue projects for any reason. She concurred with Commissioner Blank’s point about the time and money expended by applicants to present their applications as well as staff’s time in preparing their reports, only to be continued by one Commissioner. She would like to see a majority vote required to continue an item in those circumstances. She believed that if there were a good reason to continue an item, the Commissioners would be reasonable and respect that reason. Commissioner Blank would be open to that suggestion and noted that there may be a session with Ms. Roberts and Ms. Maas, if they were agreeable, to discuss the inconsistencies of concern to the Planning Commission. Ms. Decker noted that the most recent Handbook printing date was 2004 and did not know the most recent revision date. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2007 Page 16 of 20