PC 031407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Harryman noted that was a very good point and noted that was why Commissioners did not want to comment on items that have already been heard by the Commission. Staff Review Board Commissioner O’Connor referred to a notice for the Michael Aminian subdivision of three homes, which had been approved by the Planning Commission and was approved by City Council. He noted that this item would be going to the Staff Review Board on March 22, 2007 and requested clarification of this notice. Ms. Decker described the makeup and function of the Staff Review Board for the purposes of a Minor Subdivision. Tutoring Center Ordinance/State Fire Marshall Classification Chairperson Fox requested that before PRZ-37 went to City Council, staff check into a State Fire Marshall Code interpretation service. She read: “A facility provides tutoring to children ranging in ages from preschool to 18 years. The center operates two to four hours a day for about 10 to 15 children at a time. What is the correct occupancy classification for this type of facility?” She noted that the answer from the State Fire Marshall in interpreting the Code, was, “All buildings must be classified into the occupancy type they most nearly resemble. Therefore, if this facility is operated in a business office building of this type, it should be classified as Group B. If operated in a home, it should be classified Group R Division III occupancy.” She noted that the Planning Commission had recommended 20 students and requested that staff check with the State Fire Marshall to ensure that the B classification applies to 20 children. Ms. Decker replied that the Planning Commission recommended that the language be changed on the form such that these uses should comply with all Federal, State, and local regulations. When the uses come in, the Planning Department will look into the specific information of the application, and if the Fire Marshall finds that it does not comply, appropriate action would be taken. She noted that Chairperson Fox’s concern was covered through the requirements of the proposed ordinance. Chairperson Fox wanted to ensure there were no surprises on the back end and would like clarification of the type of occupancy of this use. Ms. Decker further explained the process for the benefit of the Commission. Valley Humane Society Chairperson Fox noted that she heard that Valley Humane Society had received its temporary occupancy permit. Ms. Decker noted that she did not have specific information that the use permit had been granted but understood they had some work to do at the building. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 14, 2007 Page 19 of 21