My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062707
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 062707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:30:42 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/27/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding the types of uses to be considered <br />for the Retail Center, Ms. Decker replied that the list of uses were included in <br />Attachment 4. <br /> <br />Mary Roberts, 1666 Frog Hill Lane, recalled the Planning Commission’s approval of <br />Miracle Auto Painting, which has not been built yet. She noted that there had been no <br />traffic study for that application because it was assumed that all of Stanley Business Park <br />would be built out for the types of uses enumerated in the staff report. She noted that <br />with the gas station application, the primary focus had been on design. She noted that the <br />Home Depot proposal was a much larger project and believed that payment of the traffic <br />impact fees would be sufficient. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to approve PDR-563, subject to the conditions of <br />approval as listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum expressed concern with respect to Condition No. 17 the proposed <br />colors posed too much of a contrast to the buildings in that area. She would like some <br />verbiage to review the colors one more time as the project progresses. With respect to <br />Condition No. 18, she believed that Saturday construction should be allowed because the <br />site was not in a residential neighborhood. In addition, access to the site would be <br />through main streets. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that it was difficult to examine the colors accurately in the <br />light provided in the Chambers. He suggested bringing this item back for a color review. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that the nearby buildings were all light in color with dark <br />accents. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank proposed an amendment to the motion to require the colors to <br />be consistent with the surrounding architecture and buildings, subject to the <br />approval of the Planning Department. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker suggested that larger color samples could be brought back to the Planning <br />Commission as an information item. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank proposed the following verbiage to be added to Condition <br />No. 17: “Stucco samples will be supplied and information reported to the Planning <br />Commission” and to modify Condition No. 18 be changed to allow site <br />improvements and construction on Saturdays. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson accepted the proposed amendment. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 27, 2007 Page 5 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.