Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Iserson replied that the Hatsushi development is an approved PUD and is not up for <br />discussion at this meeting. He added that construction traffic for PUD-56 can be <br />discussed during the public hearing for that item. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox recalled that one issue for the Hatsushi development was that <br />construction traffic would go along the emergency vehicle access (EVA) until Clara Lane <br />is developed, after which construction traffic would follow another route. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson concurred, noting that according to the Specific Plan, construction traffic for <br />the Hatsushi development would use Montevino Drive and the EVA off that road. When <br />the Clara Lane extension onto the property is extended, the EVA would be closed to any <br />traffic other than emergency vehicles; construction traffic would use Clara Lane to serve <br />the Hatsushi development. <br /> <br />Mr. Bawa noted that he and other neighbors were not notified of those plans and inquired <br />what their course of action could be. Mr. Iserson noted that every property owner would <br />have been sent a notice at that time. He added that there is no specific process for the <br />residents at this time because the PUD for the Hatsushi development had been approved, <br />and the appeal period was over. He suggested that Mr. Bawa contact him in the Planning <br />office during business hours. <br /> <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> <br />There were no items. <br /> <br /> <br />6.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />a. PUD-56, Michael Aminian/Mohsen Sadri <br /> <br />Application for PUD development plan approval to allow three new single-family <br />homes on an approximately 2.45-acre parcel located at 865 Clara Lane, in the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan area. Zoning for the property is <br />PUD-LDR and OS (Planned Unit Development – Low Density Residential and <br />Open Space) District. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Robin Giffin summarized the staff report and detailed the background, <br />scope and layout of the proposed project. Regarding the Hatsushi property, the Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor Specific Plan stated that some of the homes could be limited to 25 feet <br />in height to preserve the privacy and views of the homes on Montevino Drive. The <br />Specific Plan does not have such a restriction for the proposed home on Lot 1 and set the <br />maximum house height limit at 30 feet. The applicant noted to staff that if he is required <br />to build a one-story home on Lot 1, he would prefer to keep the existing one-story house <br />and possibly propose a new one-story house at a later date. If the Commission supported <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 2 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />