PC 041107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Olson noted that he recalls Commissioner Blank specifically mentioning access via Red Feather Court and indicated that this should be added as it is a key point as an alternative. He deferred to Commissioner Blank, who confirmed that he did mention both Red Feather Court and Grey Eagle Court. Chairperson Fox requested that the second sentence of the third paragraph on page 2 be modified to read as follows: “They Mr. Bentley expressed concern regarding a safety issue regarding the EVA through Golden Grey Eagle Court; Mr. Fulton expressed concern that the packet was so large and would require additional time to read the material.” Chairperson Fox noted that with respect to the last paragraph on page 8, Mr. Fulton made a comment on second units and inquired whether that meant there were going to be 102 units as opposed to the proposed 51 units. She requested that staff review the tape and include the details in this regard. Commissioner Narum moved to approve the Minutes of the March 28, 2007 Planning Commission meeting as amended. Commissioner Blank seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Olson, Narum, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner O’Connor. The motion passed, and the minutes of March 28, 2007 were approved as amended. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. Michael O’Callaghan, 125 West Neal Street, noted that he has been a business person in Pleasanton for over thirty years and is currently experiencing a high volume of building and development work. He stated that he has a current proposal for 725 Main Street involving tearing down the old structure and putting up a new building to enhance the Downtown. He indicated that the Planning staff had indicated that because the Commission will be considering several large projects in the next two months, his project cannot be put on a Commission agenda until possibly June. He expressed concern about not being able to service his clients in a timely manner and perhaps eventually losing them. He acknowledged that staff work hard to do their part but was aware that the Commission can only do so much at each meeting. He inquired if the Commission could hold one or two extra meetings a month to catch up with projects and shorten the processing time of his project as well as those others ahead of him. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 11, 2007 Page 2 of 18