Laserfiche WebLink
in writing local congressional delegation requesting support for H.R. 2233 but separating <br />C from the motion. <br /> <br /> Ayes: Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Sullivan/Hosterman that the Council form a task force or refer the <br />matter to the Human Services Commission and ask for their input on who should be on <br />that task force to study community needs for medical marijuana and whether or not it is <br />being met. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: Councilmember Cook-Kallio agreed a lot of information was brought <br />forward, but felt that we may not get the answer with this, but she still would like to do this <br />as it provides people a safe way to provide the information without coming in front of the <br />Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGovern agreed there was always more information on issues, but at <br />some point as an elected official, information must be taken, seek more information and <br />then make a decision. She felt the Council prolongs things and the public has recourse. <br />She would like to make the decision of federal law and move on, and she could not <br />support the motion, and Councilmember Thorne echoed her comments. <br /> <br /> Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Cook-Kallio, Sullivan Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: McGovern and Thorne <br />Absent: None <br /> <br />23. Reviewed and provided comments concerning the Draft Energy Element of the General <br />Plan <br /> <br />Principal Planner Janice Stern presented the draft energy element of the general plan, <br />said the element was completed in 2005, and Scott Baker, Assistant Director of Public <br />Works Operations and John Deacon, Energy consultant with HDR BVA in San Francisco <br />and previously worked with the Pleasanton Energy committee as a technical advisor were <br />available to answer questions. She gave a background of the committee’s role, <br />membership, objective to move the city towards a more sustainable energy future and <br />improve environmental quality. She noted the element was an optional element to the <br />general plan and the City adopted the residential green building ordinance, completed an <br />energy efficient model for the fire station, which are consistent with the element policies. <br /> <br />The element went under extensive review and amendment, the committee supported the <br />goals, had some concerns that some of the non-mandatory aspects could add project <br />review time, several entities reviewed it, the Chamber agreed with it and supported a <br />cooperative rather than mandatory approach to many of the programs, recommended the <br />Go Green Initiatives be included in the plan, and expressed school busing would be <br />unlikely but saw the need to reduce car trips to school. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed the plan comprehensively, they did some rewriting of the introduction and <br />eliminated a proposal to establish an energy manager in the City and wanted it left to the <br />city manager. They proposed guidelines and incentives and replaced some of those <br />programs that had regulatory aspects, and eliminated references and naming specific <br /> <br />City Council Minutes 11 June 5, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />