Laserfiche WebLink
Louis Rivara, a Pleasanton resident, believed churches are an asset to the community. <br />He supported the revised master expansion plan and wished there was a way in the City for <br />applicants who are presenting expansion plans for a proposed project to not live in fear of what <br />neighbors were going to say and a way to adequately deal with many of the concerns without <br />the expenditure of money that is necessitated. <br />Patricia Haller, a member of St. Clare's, thanked Council for conducting the consensus- <br />building process and the opportunity to revise the master expansion plan that meets the needs <br />of St. Clare's congregation. This process made members of St. Clare's aware that it needs to <br />continue to build bridges to its neighbors. She noted that there is an ongoing trend to push <br />churches out of the neighborhoods. She asked Council to keep in mind that churches do <br />belong in residential neighborhoods. She made reference to a petition in which she collected <br />over 200 signatures of people in support of St. Clare's right to expand in its current location on <br />Hopyard Road, and to request that Council approve size, location and layout of the overall <br />master plan and all three phases of the 25 year proposal as presented at the end of the <br />facilitated discussions so that this lengthy process need not be repeated for each phase of the <br />project. <br />Sharrell Michelotti, a Pleasanton resident, strongly believed St. Clare's had the right to <br />develop and expand its facilities. She commended Council for allowing and staff for developing <br />a consensus-building public process including the Church and neighborhood representatives to <br />identify a project mutually agreeable to both parties. She hoped the consensus-building public <br />process could be used in the future and hoped that when it is put into effect, a limited amount of <br />time will pass before the Planning Commission or Council's decision takes place to avoid being <br />elongated, such as this project. She supported staff's recommendation to deny the appeal and <br />approve the revised master expansion plan to allow the expansion of the existing church facility <br />in three phases; approve the design review for Phase I construction, and require, in the future, <br />design review by the Planning Commission for Phase II and Phase III. <br />Ted Crowton, a Pleasanton resident, was thankful to Council for allowing staff to develop <br />a consensus-building public process which allowed for a revised master expansion plan that <br />that includes three phases, estimated to span 25 years or more. He supported the revised <br />master expansion plan which removed the proposed parking area on the northeast end of the <br />property, eliminated access to the driveway on National Park Road and reduced parking spaces <br />from 104 to 75. <br />Connie Cox, President of the Valley Trails Homeowners Association, supported the <br />revised master expansion plan. She thanked Council for allowing staff to develop aconsensus- <br />building public process, particularly staff and the facilitator for its efforts in presenting a revised <br />master plan, which is the result of successful negotiations related to the design of the St. Clare's <br />site. This process allowed for the neighbors to be heard and the concerns were addressed. <br />Mayor Hosterman declared the public hearing closed. <br />Mr. Sullivan congratulated everyone involved in the process, which is a testament to St. <br />Clare's willingness to go back to the table and be good neighbors and work with the <br />neighborhood in trying to identify and resolve the real issues and work together to constructively <br />reach a consensus that both the Church and the neighborhood could support. He believed this <br />particular consensus-building public process should be used as a model for future contentious <br />projects. <br />Pleasanton City Council 7 09/06/05 <br />Minutes <br />