My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090605
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN090605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:45 AM
Creation date
6/7/2007 1:58:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN090605
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
give the Downtown an additional 100 parking spaces. He questioned the methodology used by <br />the PDA to arrive at the land cost of $35 per square feet, as he did not believe land has been <br />selling in the Downtown for this amount and has not been for years. He also refuted a <br />statement made by Mr. O'Callaghan with regard to the total estimated cost per parking space of <br />$13,901, which was lower than the City's estimate. He believed it was important as to how the <br />Council uses the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program. <br />Vanessa Kawaihau, a Happy Valley resident, mentioned that several months ago the <br />one-acre parcel between Ray and Spring Streets was going to be considered surplus and <br />auctioned off by Alameda County. She asked staff if it was following this and if it was going to <br />make a bid on this piece of property as it could potentially be used for public parking and <br />facilitate the Trails Program in the Downtown area. She noted the importance of having <br />additional parking in the Downtown for those who like the convenience of shopping in small <br />stores. <br />Peter MacDonald, a Pleasanton resident and business owner in the Downtown, <br />supported the PDA's recommendation and concurred with Ms. Revelli's comments. He pointed <br />out that a key part of the Downtown Specific Plan is to provide public parking lots in the <br />Downtown. The PDA wanted to get away from blanket parking waivers where one development <br />gets waived. He noted that In-Lieu fee only applies to the final 30 percent of the parking as the <br />first 70 percent of parking is provided on site. For developers who wish a waiver below 30 <br />percent in-lieu, he believed the City was developing and creating a Parking Garage In-Lieu fee. <br />If the Downtown is to be successful in the future, it must involve some intensification and shared <br />public parking lots. <br />Mayor Hosterman asked Mr. MacDonald if the PDA's estimate for the total estimate cost <br />per parking space not only valued the property but also worked to achieve a balance between <br />the amounts per parking space with the needs of business downtown. <br />Mr. MacDonald said the figure used was taken from a City appraisal that was <br />commissioned and reviewed comprised of current fees approximately one year ago. The kind <br />of prices that some of the land is selling for in the Downtown implies buildings would rent for six <br />dollars per square foot which is not reality and may not be realistic unless parking garages, <br />shared parking and greater intensity of development is utilized in the Downtown. He noted that <br />there is a significant amount of potential for redevelopment in the Downtown. Those who are <br />considering redevelopment are being handcuffed by the fact that the City does not have an <br />established in-lieu fee. The PDA Parking Committee is meeting with blocks of downtown <br />property owners and developing assessment district proposals, but a key component of the <br />equation is an established Parking In-Lieu fee. <br />Mayor Hosterman closed the public comments. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked staff if it believed that the Parking In-Lieu fee of $14,000 based on <br />the $35,000 per square foot is the actual cost, or is it a fee that is fair for the City to collect <br />knowing that parking will be subsidized by the General Fund. <br />Mr. Iserson believed it was closer to the later and staff recognized in its report that there <br />is some discounting occurring. Staff recognizes this and is going beyond this by making a value <br />statement that the Parking In-Lieu Fee needs to be balanced with the goals of continuing to <br />encourage development in the Downtown that is anticipated by the Specific Plan to continue to <br />Pleasanton City Council 26 09/06/05 <br />Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.