My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090605
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN090605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:45 AM
Creation date
6/7/2007 1:58:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN090605
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property owner has a secondary unit in the Downtown, he asked if they were required to supply <br />parking? <br />Mr. Iserson pointed out that the Parking In-Lieu Fee is only applicable to the <br />commercially zoned area of Downtown. There is a parking requirement for second units, which <br />is one space and does not need to be covered. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how staff and the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA) Parking <br />Committee arrived at the $35 per square foot for land cost? <br />Mr. Iserson said the formula developed by both the PDA and staff was developed within <br />the last year. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how many parking spaces could be constructed now based on the <br />money available in the Parking In-Lieu Fee fund? <br />Mr. Iserson said the Parking In-Lieu Fee fund contains about $215,000. The City has <br />also budgeted separate additional funds in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the <br />acquisition of land and construction of public parking lots in the Downtown. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if the intent was for the Downtown District to pay for the parking in <br />the Downtown, or was the City always intending to contribute towards parking in the Downtown? <br />Mr. Fialho said there had always been the expectation that the City would finance a <br />portion of the public parking improvements in the Downtown. Approximately $3,000,000 has <br />been set aside for acquisition of the Corridor and/or establishing parking somewhere in the <br />Downtown District. <br />Mr. Iserson noted that there are various mechanisms for downtown parking, one of <br />which is a public/private partnership, which is represented by the In-Lieu fee. Parking <br />Assessment Districts are another example and the City has one district. In addition, there is on- <br />street parking which the City provides free of charge. <br />Second to restrooms for the Downtown, Ms. McGovern believed the main concern of <br />downtown residents has been the issue of adequate parking. She inquired about the City's <br />parking plan and if it included development of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor? <br />Mr. Iserson said the Downtown Specific Plan identified approximately 300 spaces in the <br />Corridor from Bernal Avenue to Stanley Boulevard. He was uncertain if parking spaces would <br />be included all the way up Stanley Boulevard. <br />Ms. McGovern asked if a needs assessment study had been conducted to determine the <br />adequate amount of parking spaces? <br />Mr. Iserson said a needs assessment study was conducted during the Downtown <br />Specific Plan. The number of parking spaces was counted for the Downtown and compared to <br />the floor area. In addition, projected increase of floor area in the Downtown over the next 20 <br />years was considered and from that a commensurate parking demand was developed based on <br />that growth. After the completion of the needs assessment study, 400 parking spaces were <br />identified for the Downtown that would consist of both public and private parking spaces. <br />Pleasanton City Council 24 09/06/05 <br />Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.