My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN013007 (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
CCMIN013007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 3:27:51 PM
Creation date
3/21/2007 1:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/30/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN013007WS
NOTES
JOINT CC/PC WORKSHOP
NOTES 3
GENERAL PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
debates for years on what and when to model. He indicated the intention was never to <br />make a decision without the benefit of the traffic models. He indicated he is a strong <br />supporter of transit-oriented development at Hacienda, but it did not mean he approves <br />1,200 units right now. He believes there are benefits to that from an environmental <br />standpoint. He believes this was the best opportunity to do anything significant for <br />affordable housing in Pleasanton. He pointed out that the traffic models are tools that do <br />not make decisions and that the tool is only as good as the assumptions that are used. <br />He also noted the city is dealing with problems with the regional transportation system. <br />Councilmember McGovern commented on the history of Stoneridge Drive. She noted <br />the Stoneridge extension was put on hold. She indicated at that time, funding was <br />based on population, which meant larger cities got more money than smaller cities. The <br />Triangle Study started because the three cities thought if they applied with one voice, <br />they might get more transportation funding for projects. As the study proceeded and <br />traffic got worse, the idea of port to port impacts evolved. The idea being that if goods <br />cannot travel back and forth from the port of Oakland to the port of Stockton, it was <br />impacting the financial status of the State of California. She noted that she has spoken <br />with the residents near Valley and Santa Rita and advised them not to look at just <br />Stoneridge as being a priority to help the neighborhoods but that they should also <br />consider the east side study and how to get enough funding to mitigate problems in that <br />area of town as well. <br />Mayor Hosterman indicated that everything possible has been done to identify the <br />opportunities for the community. She acknowledged a problem with the Congestion <br />Management Agency in focusing on the problems in this area. She noted as a <br />representative of a city with only 50,000 to 100,000 residents, she has one vote versus <br />the representative from a city like Oakland who gets eight votes. She believed money <br />should be spent on the most highly congested areas instead of just in the largest <br />communities. For now, Pleasanton is in a unique situation being at the intersection of <br />two major freeways. It has been beneficial in terms of business, but is a nightmare for <br />the residents and commuters during peak hours. She noted this is an opportunity to <br />address those issues and improve circulation within our city keeping in mind the heavy <br />impacts on the city from a freeway system that isn't working. She noted things have <br />changed and there are opportunities for more transportation dollars for the area. She <br />pointed out the CMA has supported funding a $75 million project to add an eastbound <br />lane on I-580 from Hacienda to Greenville Road and believes that will give some relief <br />She stated the model is based on the best estimates based on the build out of the <br />surrounding communities and what is happening in the Central Valley. She noted the <br />goal is to get to a point where people in the community can move freely. She indicated <br />she wanted to identify quality of life issues important to the community. <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further discussion, the joint workshop was adjourned at 10:39 p.m. <br />Resp ctfully ubmitted, <br />c ~~Y~~--<<, <br />Ka en Diaz <br />City Clerk <br />City Council Minutes 15 January 30, 2007 <br />Joint Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.