CCMIN013007 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Hosterman thanked everyone for all their time and hard work and noted this has been a lengthy process and noted that those who are most impacted are those with development proposals on hold pending completion of the General Plan update. In addition she indicated it has taken a lot of staff time. This is the most important General Plan update this city has had and it is important to take as much time as necessary to get the job done right. Councilmember Cook-Kallio supported the modeling of Stoneridge now to get more data. She also supports the modeling of the TOD development for the same reasons as expressed by other Commissioners. She noted her mixed feelings regarding the gateways as she did not want to inhibit entrances to the freeway and she did not like the idea of taking out any landscaping. Councilmember McGovern indicated she would like Stoneridge modeled soon and agreed with Commissioners Fox and Blank about getting a range of data. She believed traffic assumptions were based on averages and did not provide the broad spectrum of what is high or low. She expressed deep concerns about the transit-oriented development as she is uncertain it would bring the level of affordability the city needs. She noted it is right next to the most congested part of the city and even if 40% of the residents take BART, it still added traffic to congested areas. She indicated she may consider a TOD development of 350-400 units. She noted her concern and confusion about constrained gateways. She agreed with limiting the number of cars getting onto Vineyard Avenue and believed she would have to consider each area on a case-by-case basis to see what the impacts would be. Councilmember Thorne believed by constraining the gateways into the city, it was constraining Pleasanton residents from getting home from work. However, he believed there should be a constrained gateway policy in the General Plan. He pointed out that by reducing the number of people getting onto a freeway, it also reduces the number of people who get off and try to get back on at another point. He said he first asked for a traffic model of the Stoneridge Drive extension four years ago and since that time the community has become more polarized on the issue. He thought part of that polarization is because the data has not been gathered and no decision has been made. He supported doing the models with and without the extension as soon as possible in order to make a decision to stop the division of neighborhoods in the city. He agreed with validating the models. He wants to check the performance of the models and have the flexibility to act if it is not working. He supports modeling the transit-oriented development but was uncertain whether he could support over 1,200 units in one place. He further indicated when the models were done he wanted to make certain the issues regarding Busch Road were included. Councilmember Sullivan indicated he supported the constrained gateway policy. He acknowledged the negative impact for local residents trying to get onto the freeway, but believed the concept was trying to keep freeway traffic on the freeway and not on city streets. He noted even though it is hard getting on the freeway, the benefit is the freeway continues to move more free flowing, which encourages people to stay on the freeway. He suggested relaxing the level of service standards at those gateways in order to enact the policy. He agreed landscaping is an issue, but felt it was secondary to the function of what is trying to be accomplished. He supports doing the modeling now and noted the Mayor, Commissioner Fox and himself were the only ones that were on the Council or Commission when the process started. He stated there have been City Council Minutes 14 January 30, 2007 Joint Workshop