Laserfiche WebLink
20. a. Review and approve the updated draft Financing Plan for Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Infrastructure Improvements <br />Assistant City Manager Bocian gave an overview of the Draft Financing Plan indicating <br />this report updates the Draft Financing Plan for Vineyard Avenue Corridor Infrastructure <br />Improvements (Financing Plan) (Attachment 2) approved by the Council at its meeting of <br />September 19, 2006. The Updated Financing Plan (Attachment 1) is provided in response <br />to Council's request to revisit the Financing Plan prior to making additional expenditures in <br />the Vineyard Corridor. The Updated Financing Plan also includes funding adjustments to <br />meet expenses related to constructing additional Vineyard Avenue Corridor infrastructure <br />improvements as outlined in Agenda item 20b. While the Updated Financing Plan is <br />intended to be used for these projects, it retains the "Draft" label pending inclusion in the <br />FY 2007-08 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as discussed in the staff report. <br />Staff recommended approval of the Updated Plan (Attachment 1) and authorization for <br />expenditures for the Vineyard Ave. Booster Pump Station (CIP 011023), Water Turnout <br />No. 6 (CIP 011023) and related contract management and consulting services as detailed. <br />Councilmember McGovern noted she had reviewed the plan with respect to what would be <br />the total risk to the City and what the possible long-term debt would be. She came up with <br />approximately $10 million. Staff responded the total loan amount is $8.4 million. <br />In response to question, City Manager Fialho explained how the debt is reflected and what <br />will be required annually in financial reports. <br />Councilmember McGovern expressed concerns with the long-term debt and that initially <br />there was a school site that was to pay a large portion of the financing plan. She stated <br />she is uncomfortable with the financing plan as there are too many unknowns as to how to <br />fund this. She added she hoped that the fee study would have been done so that the <br />Council could look at where other fees could be of help. She expressed she is not sure all <br />the proposed money will be reimbursed. She also noted that every time something is <br />approved before the fee study is done and new fees are in place, the City goes deeper in <br />the hole. She questioned if there was a way to hold off with the fees until the study is <br />done and then when it moves forward the appropriate fees would be charged. <br />City Manager Fialho indicated the City is embarking on a rate study in the next 6 months <br />and out of that rate study the appropriate fee schedule for water will be determined. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned if there was any way to condition that the fee will <br />be paid once the full study has been done and there is a better financing plan for this <br />whole area. <br />Staff indicated the program contemplates that as development occurs and as staff <br />identifies public infrastructures needs that the City would collect the appropriate amount <br />from future development. One way would be to collect fees upfront, but it detracts from <br />the financing plan that the City currently has in place with the Vineyard Corridor. <br />Council discussed risks as it relates to development and staff indicated the cost of <br />expenditures have been mitigated to the greatest extent possible with this last action that <br />the Council is asked to take regarding the Booster Pump Station and the Turnout No. 6. <br />City Council Minutes 5 February 6, 2007 <br />