CCMIN100306 - Laserfiche WebLink

homes is not going to impact that issue further. She indicated that supporters of the project felt it would be approved since it was approved by the Planning Commission. She indicated the City needs to make Cameron safe and address those issues. She stressed that people who bought homes in the neighborhood, if they did their research, they knew that the open space areas were not zoned open space and that development would eventually occur. She concluded by indicating her support for the project. Pat Frawley indicated he lives on Equestrian Drive and commented that there still are some things that need to be further clarified as it relates to the design of the project. He expressed concern with proposed masonry walls, sound walls, traffic issues, the design of the homes, sidewalk issues and proposed or lack of proposed stop signs in various areas. He asked that the project be further considered regarding some of the fine details. He urged Council not to approve the project as proposed. Greg Jetter stated that his primary concern is related to safety. He noted he does not feel the plans address the safety issue as adequately as they could. For those reasons, he urged Council to deny the project and research further into mitigating the issues. He noted the need for more information on the density issues and added concerns regarding bus traffic. Ms. Hardy in response to public comment regarding problems with the easements on private property noted that to her understanding there is no question on the description of the right-of-way and the relationship of the existing improvements. She then explained the right-of-way details as they relate to various areas and noted they would be putting in sidewalks within the existing street right-of-way width. This will not be taking private property. With respect to traffic speeds, she noted it is an existing problem today, with or without the project, noting they believe the project presents a great opportunity for solutions. With regard to density, Ponderosa believes the density is compatible, consistent and complies with the General Plan and zoning. She went into great detail regarding the proposed housing orientation and setbacks. She added they have been mediating with the neighbors for a year and a half. She concluded by stating this is a good project before the Council and asked for support in approving the project. Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing. Councilmember Sullivan with regard to the easement and right-of-way on Cameron on the northeast side, indicated there seems to be some confusion. He asked for staff clarification on the issue. Public Works Director Wilson explained where the right-of-way currently exists by providing an overview of the corner of Martin Street and Cameron, as well as what is being proposed. In response to the density issue, staff explained in greater detail how the density was calculated. Council member Sullivan commented that one of the things he has not heard anyone say is that they don't want a project. He added what he is hearing loud and clear is that Ponderosa should be able to build a project but there are still issues out there that have not been resolved. He stated he has his own issues with the project, one City Council Minutes 14 October 3, 2006