My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091906
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN091906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 3:26:47 PM
Creation date
10/24/2006 1:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN091906
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />improvement, the pump station and the estimated costs associated with the <br />project. <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian went over the assumptions made in the Financing Plan and a <br />summary of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Future Expenses and <br />Revenues. He further detailed the summary of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Specific Plan Water and Sewer Infrastructure Funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho referenced the staff report, page 9 of 13, where staff outlined the cost <br />of the access road. He noted there was a concern expressed at the last Council <br />Meeting where this was discussed, that the City's obligations were somewhat <br />open ended and in fact, they were open-ended. In discussions with the Council <br />staff was asked to look at a way to contain the City's obligation for that <br />improvement - to basically establish some parameters. Staff did talk to the <br />developer, Mr. Resnick, and he, in full cooperation with staff, had his engineer <br />identify an estimate for the improvements based on today's dollars and has come <br />up with a revised estimate of about $1.8M. He indicated Mr. Resnick has <br />informed him that he is willing to cap the City's obligation at that amount, <br />indicating he would be taking the risk on the improvement in the future in the <br />event the project is done and the cost is higher. It would be structured in the way <br />of a reimbursement agreement, so that if he were able to do the project cheaper, <br />the City would only be obligated to reimburse him up to $1.8M. If the Council <br />chooses to pursue that reimbursement agreement to reflect this change, he <br />requested that the Council reflect in their motion to modify the second <br />amendment in the contract to reflect that cap. <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian provided a synopsis that indicates the Council is looking at approving <br />a previous City Council staff report to award a contract for the construction of a <br />water reservoir in the Vineyard corridor and other related improvements at a cost <br />of $4.6M. Secondly, as the City Manager just indicated, to direct City staff to <br />bring back an amendment for a sales and purchase agreement to basically cap <br />off the cost of the construction of the access road. He added the third issue is the <br />needed feedback regarding the financing concepts that were presented this <br />evening. <br /> <br />Mr. Roush indicated that if Council wanted, direction could be given to staff to <br />include in the amendment to the purchase and sales contract, to include the <br />concept of the $1.8M cap. He added, by awarding the contract this evening, <br />Council is putting into play the fact that the remaining improvements will need to <br />be funded and built as well, which is why the financing plan would need to come <br />back to the Council for approval. He stated this is the first step and once the <br />Council takes this step, the Council is committed to moving ahead with that and <br />finding the funds to pay for it and/or repay the City for any funds that the City has <br />to put out above and beyond the City's pro-rata share of the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan infrastructure. <br /> <br />In response to Council question, staff clarified the loan/funding process for <br />existing loans #1 and #2, as well as anticipated future loan #3. <br /> <br />In response to Mayor Hosterman's question, staff indicated they did not have any <br />concern in the sense that they don't anticipate any major water improvement <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 8 of 13 <br /> <br />September 19, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.