My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091906
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN091906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 3:26:47 PM
Creation date
10/24/2006 1:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN091906
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Fialho clarified Signature Properties, the developer of Ruby Hills, owes the <br />City about $2.7 million. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. Hearing no requests to speak, the <br />public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Council discussion included how the present Council has inherited this issue and <br />needs to figure out how to get reimbursed for the costs. It was noted that when <br />the financing plan is brought back, Council would like to see the worst-case <br />scenario included. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGovern expressed concern that there is no guarantee the cost <br />won't be more than $13M. She indicated she did not vote for this last time and <br />she still has concerns. She questioned if there is a way to use COPS, so the City <br />could take the $4.6M and sell Certificates of Participation at low interest rates. <br /> <br />Staff responded that is not possible. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern suggested a full public review of the exact total cost. <br />There are 68 homes left in this area to charge a fee to in order to cover the full <br />cost. She stressed the need to recognize the full debt before going forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho clarified that the Council would only be authorizing the spending of <br />$4.6M. Before the rest of the improvements are authorized, staff will present a <br />more refined proposal for financing/payback. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman indicated this project started years ago with a proposal for over <br />700 homes for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor. At that time there was substantial <br />community input as to what made sense. After review of the proposal, the <br />number of homes proposed was 200. The reason the Council looked seriously at <br />allowing that development was in anticipation of Neil Elementary School. The <br />School District continues to ensure the school will be built in the future. However, <br />since then homes have been built in that area and some years ago the Council <br />came up with a financing plan that included water infrastructure improvements <br />and other infrastructure improvements. She thanked staff for coming up with a <br />best-case scenario for getting the water tank built to service those new homes. <br />She believes there is no another way to deal with this issue at this time. <br /> <br />Motion: It was m/s by Sullivan/Hosterman to approve plans and specifications; <br />reviewed bids and awarded a construction contract for the Vineyard Hills <br />Reservoir and Access Road to Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. in the amount of <br />$3,942,206; approved and authorized the City Manager to execute an <br />amendment to the existing contract with Tetra Tech, Inc., in the amount of <br />$505,000 to perform construction management services, specialty inspection <br />services and geotechnical services for said project; authorized an appropriation of <br />$1,100,000 from the current fund balance in the VCSP fee account into the VCSP <br />Water Facility Project (CIP #011023); approved the First Amendment to the <br />Purchase and Sale Agreement with Threehand LP, including a cap of $1,880,000 <br />as to the City's financial participation on the finished grade portion of the road; <br />and directed staff to develop a financing plan for the remaining portions of the <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 10 of 13 <br /> <br />September 19, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.