My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN082906
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN082906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
8/25/2006 12:16:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/29/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN082906
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />removed at Sunol, but would be retained at the Ruby Hill signal on Vineyard. Staff <br />concurred. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGovern referred to the bottom of page 4 where it says, "Stoneridge <br />Drive not widened to six lanes east of Santa Rita Road and not extended to EI Charro <br />Road or Staples Ranch." If Staples Ranch is to be developed, the road must go to it. <br /> <br />Staff agreed to cross out the reference to Staples Ranch. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky asked for clarification of the regional assumptions. He believed <br />the HOV lane is one already approved for 1-580. The HOT lane pilot has been approved <br />and is in the model. On Highway 84, it is assumed to be four lanes from Pigeon Pass to <br />Stanley and six lanes from Stanley to 1-580. He asked if those three assumptions were <br />included. <br /> <br />Staff said that was correct. There is also the inclusion of an HOV lane on 1-680 from <br />Fremont to 1-580. Director Wilson further explained that there are proposed to be four <br />lanes from Isabel to 1-680, although that is not a funded project. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman indicated there are ongoing discussions about funding this <br />improvement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky asked if it would be prudent to run two models: one with Pigeon <br />Pass as is and one to see the impact with improvements. <br /> <br />Director Wilson indicated the Triangle Study would be a better method to determine the <br />impacts of Highway 84. In terms of the General Plan, he recommended using the widened <br />Highway 84 for purposes of the model. He noted the Triangle Study would be completed <br />first and the data could be used for the Pleasanton models. Our General Plan is more <br />specific to the streets within the city limits and is therefore more detailed in terms of what <br />happens to the highways. The Triangle Study is more specific in terms of what happens to <br />the regional network. The studies overlap but are not complete by themselves. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern wanted to make sure all the Councilmembers had a copy of <br />the alternatives being reviewed by the Triangle Study in terms of improvements to 1-580, <br />1-680 and Highway 84. She felt it was important for everyone to review that. She asked if <br />the City of Pleasanton was paying for the model that would include improvements to 84 <br />from 1-680 to Pigeon Pass. Staff said yes. <br /> <br />3. Draft Conservation and Open Space Element: Review of Draft Conservation and Open <br />Space Element of the General Plan (SR 06:208) <br /> <br />Principal Planner Janice Stern presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman indicated she still wanted to have a separate Water Element in the <br />General Plan and requested later discussion with Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky asked how the definition of sustainability originated. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Stern said staff did research on line and found a number of definitions. <br />Parts of each were melded into this one definition. <br /> <br />General Plan Workshop Minutes <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />August 29, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.