Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember McGovern wanted staff to have some program or policy to continue to <br />work with DSRSD to make sure there is a plan. She asked if the list of hazardous <br />materials on page v-17 had been updated to include electronic waste and their disposal. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Stern said that was addressed in the Public Facilities and Community <br />Programs Element where it talked about E-waste Day and other recycling programs. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern suggested a cross-reference be included. She then referred to <br />aviation hazards and asked if there were policies for mitigations for noise and setting <br />standards for noise levels. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Stern pointed out this was the Public Safety Element and staff was <br />looking more at the problems from a plane crash. Noise levels would be reviewed under <br />the Noise Element and acknowledged the airport would be a noise source. She also <br />noted there is an airport protection area which prohibits construction of housing around an <br />airport. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern felt there should be footnotes cross-referencing things in other <br />Elements, so the public knows where to look for topics. She cited page v-28, Program 6.4 <br />where she had trouble reading a sentence with the strikeouts. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Stern agreed the sentence was awkward, but said that referred to Figure <br />5-1, defining landslide zones. The orange area is designated "mostly landslides." There <br />are also areas of "few landslides." The sentence in question is referring to that map. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern turned to page v-34, Goal 8, and said she believed the word <br />''feasible" should be struck out. The city should provide the highest quality of police <br />services within the city. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brozosky responded to Councilmember McGovern's concerns and said <br />Policy 18 does address the disposal of hazardous waste in the city. He then addressed <br />the change of the setback from 50 feet to 100 feet from a fault and asked if already <br />approved developments had been reviewed to see if there were houses that would have <br />been affected by this. He asked if there had been problems in places where building was <br />allowed within 100 feet and is that why the setback was being changed. <br /> <br />Director Iserson said there was an issue with Golden Eagle Farm and the problem of <br />finding the exact location of the fault within that development. He was unaware of any <br />problems in that area. <br /> <br />Director Wilson indicated 50 feet has been the accepted standard for some time and used <br />successfully throughout California. The reason for changing to 100 feet is that when the <br />exact location of a fault is unknown, an estimated location is drawn and that could be off <br />by 25 feet. <br /> <br />Council member Brozosky referred to Program 26.2, "submit all discretionary use permits <br />to the Police Department for analysis of and recommendations to reduce impacts on police <br />services." He asked what kind of discretionary use permits were covered by this. <br /> <br />General Plan Workshop Minutes <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />August 29, 2006 <br />