My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 87416
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
RES 87416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2012 9:57:20 AM
Creation date
12/6/1999 11:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/15/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA COUNTY so.u, <br />399 Elmhurst Strut, Hayward, California ~ (~15) 670-5400 <br /> <br /> DATE: August 14, 1987 <br /> TO: Chairman and Board Members, Alameda County Board of Supervisors <br /> <br /> Mayors and Councilmembers, Cities of Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, <br /> Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livemore, Newark, Oakland, <br /> Piedmont, Pleasanton, San Leandro, and Union City <br /> <br /> Chairmen and Board Members, Castro Valley Sanitary District, Oro <br /> Loma Sanitary District, and Dublin-San Ramon Services District <br /> <br /> FROM: Kenneth Mercer~ Preside of the Alameda County Solid Waste ManaSs- <br /> SUBJECT: UNTY SOLI AGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br /> Enclosed is the Final Draft County Solid Waste Management Plan prepared by <br /> Black & Veatch, consultants. The Plan and CEQA Negative Declaration were <br /> approved by the full Authority on July 29. Changes to the Final Draft Plan <br /> made by the Authority at the July 29 meeting are included in an Addendum <br /> enclosed with the Plan. <br /> <br /> After approval by the Authority, state law provides 90 days for the cities to <br /> review the plan and either approve or disapprove. Failure to act within that <br /> period is deemed to be plan approval. The plan must be approved by a majority <br /> of the cities in the county containing a majority of the incorporated popula- <br /> tion, using State Department of Finance population figures (enclosed). As a <br /> practical matter, we believe that the plan must be adopted unanimously or <br /> nearly unanimously. <br /> <br /> As a courtesy, the plan is also submitted for review and approval to the <br /> County Board of Supervisors and the three special districts that are members <br /> of the Authority. The special districts are not included in the state formula. <br /> The Board of Supervisors have designated the Authority to be responsible for <br /> preparation of the plan. In the past, the Board of Supervisors and district <br /> boards have reviewed and approved the plan. <br /> <br /> After adoption by the cities, the plan is submitted to the California Waste <br /> Management Board for its approval. <br /> <br /> We have enclosed a summary of the major features of the Final Draft, focussing <br /> on differences between the current plan adopted in 1982 and the proposed Draft. <br /> <br /> If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Bill Fraley or Betty <br /> Croly at the County Planning Department at 670-5400. Authority staff will be <br /> available to attend council and board meetings to respond to questions on the <br /> plan. Please call Bill Fraley, Secretary to the Authority, if you would like <br /> a staff member to attend your meeting. <br /> <br /> 0166d <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.