CCMIN050206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. McGovern asked about the Odd Fellows in Livermore. Mr. Fialho clarified that the Livermore lodge are the trustees of the Pleasanton cemetery. Ms. McGovern asked if the cemetery could be expanded, should someone purchase the property. Mr. Sloan responded that it may not work financially. Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. Peter Bailey, a Pleasanton resident, commented that the cemetery is a valued property and significant to Pleasanton's history and that he supports its preservation. Chris Beratlis, a Pleasanton resident, commented that maintenance has been a problem for a long time; he has petitions in support of preserving the property. Howard Neely, a Pleasanton resident, read an official letter from the Odd Fellows in support of the City's oversight of the cemetery. Scott Kinney, a Clayton resident, commented that his father, a former Pleasanton mayor, is buried at the cemetery, as are other founders and that he is in support of the City taking responsibility for the property. Charles Huff, a Pleasanton resident, commented that he supports the City's involvement with the cemetery. Gary Schwaegerle, a Pleasanton resident, commented that he supports the City taking over the cemetery. Mayor Hosterman closed the public comments. Mr. Brozosky commented on the significant Pleasanton history and founders buried at the cemetery and believed the City should preserve the property; he commented that children could etch the tombstones during field trips; he said the property would deteriorate if nothing were done; he noted the issue is running out of time; he does not want City crews and prefers getting experts in the field of cemetery maintenance. It was moved by Mr. Brozosky, seconded by Mr. Thorne to direct the City to maintain and preserve the site. Motion died due to lack of support. Mr. Thorne expressed concern about the City's involvement, but would support looking to other agencies and experts for information. Mr. Sullivan commented on the property as a significant historical resource; he would like more clarification on the direction and would like to identify the current obligations and risks; he suggested the matter be sent back to staff for details; he was not certain about the City's role, and stated that combined with the museum was a good concept. Pleasanton City Council Minutes 5 05/02106