Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Matt Sullivan did not want to reduce any public and institutional zoning. Valley Trails <br />should not change and he allocated zero units to that site. He was concerned about additional <br />development west of Foothill Road and impacts on the environment and visibility. He was in <br />favor of any policies to deal with that. He supported the suggested hillside residential zoning or <br />some kind of form-based code. Regarding the Lemoine property, he did not want to prevent the <br />family from building homes for their children, but if they go from 13 to 26 units, there are a lot of <br />people in that family. He commented there has been a lot of discussion on the General Plan <br />and it is time to start narrowing the focus in order to proceed with the traffic models. However, <br />in another sense, he did not think there was enough information to allocate specific units to <br />sites. Hacienda Business Park is an example because there have not been detailed proposals <br />or traffic models to show if there is a beneficial impact from transit-oriented development. He <br />believed there should be two models: one along the lines of the dispersed residential model <br />and one on the true transit-oriented development model. He felt there was a benefit to TOD <br />because infrastructure is in place and there would be traffic and transportation improvements <br />since it is next to public transit. It would be a walkable community for shopping or employment <br />destinations. He noted that neither option was caste in stone and would still have considerable <br />discussion, but he wanted the additional data before making any decisions. His comments on <br />the units would be flexible depending on which scenario was being considered. If dispersed <br />land use is being discussed, the unit numbers may be higher. If TOD is being discussed, then <br />the units have to come from elsewhere in the city. The reserve should start at 200 units and <br />could be increased later. He had concerns that the West Dublin BART station proposal would <br />be a truly viable transit-oriented development. He felt there was a critical number of units <br />necessary to make it work and there needed to be mixed-use commercial amenities otherwise <br />people would just get in their cars and drive some place. He would like to look at both BART <br />stations to see how transit-oriented development would work. Regarding Staples Ranch, he <br />suggested some number of units between 65 and 240. The staff analysis was good, but he felt <br />there could be more assisted living units than estimated. The number he gave for allocation <br />was 175 units. He agreed a specific plan is needed for the east side and the quarries. <br />However, he did not believe housing in that area made sense. There are already major traffic <br />problems in the area and he felt light industrial, commercial, or office was a better fit. That could <br />be a great high tech business park combined with some kind of educational branch from a <br />college. That could help stimulate more economic development in that realm. He agreed with <br />adding units to Kottinger Place/Pleasanton Gardens, but felt 100 units might be too much. He <br />was concerned about how to do it and what to do with the residents during construction. He <br />would reserve 50-100 for that location. Regarding downtown, he supported more residential or <br />mixed-use development. There is discussion about redoing the civic center or expanding the <br />library using the vacant property next door. He suggested a public/private partnership to <br />provide residential units near the ACE station. He could accept 200 units for downtown <br />residential. As discussion continues on the General Plan, there make be units made available <br />from other places, such as the southeast hills, that could be put in the reserve and reallocated <br />later. In general, he wanted two scenarios: one for the TOD in north Pleasanton and one using <br />a more dispersed model. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman favored no changes to the public and institutional zoning. The Valley <br />Trails neighborhood fought a change years ago and should not have to do it over and over <br />again. Her favorite Option was B3 on Attachment 2. At some point there will be discussion <br />about a reserve of units for a future Council to consider, but right now it is necessary to create a <br />model with a dispersal of units that will provide an opportunity to prepare a model of what the <br />traffic will look like. She wanted to spread out the units as far as possible to get a snapshot of <br />traffic. More discussions can then be held to refine the numbers. She noted there is a potential <br />for 1,686 residential units with no idea where they will be placed and she did not want anyone to <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />04/25/06 <br />