My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030706
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN030706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:43 AM
Creation date
3/3/2006 9:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030706
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Sullivan noted that the preferred option identified in the staff report seemed to be <br />reducing the project scope for the Kottinger Creek Restoration project. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho pointed out that Council gets caught up in the "wanting to get it done" <br />philosophy and sometimes what is forgotten is a public review process. The reason staff is <br />vague on the Kottinger Creek Restoration project is because Council has not weighed in at this <br />point. He was not comfortable recommending a further allocation for this project until Council <br />has weighed in from a policy perspective. <br /> <br />It was moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mayor Hosterman, to approve the <br />proposed funding plan and its inclusion as part of the FY 2005/06 mid-term CIP with the <br />condition that staff provides Council with a funding plan for the Kottinger Creek <br />Renovation project at the time the project specification and design are reviewed. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky was comfortable with staff's recommendation. By approving the proposed <br />funding plan, he did not believe it tied Council's hands. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern believed she was taking a leap of faith on each of the five projects. She <br />was not certain that the bids would come in at the projected cost estimates. She asked what <br />would occur if the bid for the Veterans Memorial Building were more than the project cost <br />estimate? <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian said staff would need to address the shortfall and as part of this funding plan, <br />staff is recommending setting aside a reserve in the CIPR to address some of these issues. He <br />believed that Mr. Brozosky was accurate in the sense that this funding plan addresses and <br />provides Council and the members of the community interested in these projects a clear idea <br />that there is funding to move forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho reminded Council that staff is actively pursuing federal grants for some of <br />these projects including the Veterans Memorial Building, the Alviso Adobe Community Park <br />project and the Vineyard Avenue Resurfacing project. If staff is successful in its attempts, the <br />City is basically reimbursing itself and making more funding available for contingency or putting <br />the money in the CIPR which can be reprogrammed for another project. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan clarified that the funding plan was not contingent upon the $304,000 grant <br />for the Kottinger Creek Restoration project. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Mr. Brozosky, Mr. Fialho said staff would provide a plan that <br />the neighborhood and staff is proposing including available funding for the Kottinger Creek <br />Restoration project. Staff will also identify options if Council wishes to build this project given <br />the current existing funds available. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Brozosky, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, and <br />Mayor Hosterman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAINED: None <br /> <br />There was a break at 9:40 p.m. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />03/07/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.